Home Corona 7th Amendment: Can A Covid Jabee Sue For Damages?

7th Amendment: Can A Covid Jabee Sue For Damages?

38

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB 

If you were injured by a Covid-19 vaccine, including fatally injured, is there any money due? Yes, in 2005, Congress passed the PREP Act. The gist of it was that health emergencies require speeded-up production of “countermeasures.” (That’s a code word for vaccination, which I recall being worried about when it appeared in 2002 in the constitutionally outrageous Homeland Security Act.) (Caused by Bin Laden, you know.)

The PREP includes a “Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program,” a CICP. Money that can be obtained from it will come from taxpayers. Why? Because Big Pharma has enough influence, I presume, to obtain legislation that protects vaccine manufacturers from liability. This is but an example of how any interest group can press Congress into service.  I’m familiar with how this worked in regard to the autism epidemic of the late 1980s. See below.

The Seventh Amendment Right To Sue

Amendment VII of the US Constitution says, about as plainly as could possibly be said:

“In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

Nonetheless, in 1986, Congress placed a barrier to that, for parents of autistic children who claimed the autism resulted from vaccination. This legislation, The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVI), all but deleted the Seventh Amendment. It required the parent to first go to the new NCVI court, before suing anyone.

Yes, in 1986 Congress created a new federal court out of thin air. It’s constitutional to do so under Article I, sec 8, clause 9, “The Congress shall have Power… to constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court.”

Please listen to the NCVI story, before we get to the Covid compo business. Normally governments have a right to claim sovereign immunity and not get sued. But in 1948, Congress set up a United States Court of Federal Claims, allowing people to seek action for torts. As published in the Code, at 28 USC 1346, you can sue “under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.”

In the vaccine saga, however, the person who does the neglecting is not the government; it is the manufacturers of the vaccine, perhaps, or the doctor or nurse who went a jab too far. The only way the feds got to create this court was on the far-out justification that the vaccine recipient, that is, the jabee, was doing a public good. The jabee helped others not have the disease spread to them.

The Table

Per the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, no individual has to prove her case, provided she meets the factors listed on the “Vaccine Table.” Thus, many cases are for a foregone conclusion. For example, if the injury sustained after a vaccination is encephalopathy, chronic arthritis, paralytic polio, etc (but not autism), the case will be paid.

Qualifications for an award are as follows:

The claimant (technically called “the petitioner”) must be a child, not an adult.

The injury must have occurred shortly after the jab (but up to 30 days if paralytic polio).

The claim must be filed within 36 months of injury.

Payments are as follows:

The average award as of 2010 was $822,000, the top award being $4.9 million.

The ‘pain and suffering’ component of the calculation is capped at $250,000.

All death cases are paid exactly $250,000. (This figure is the same as it was in 1986.)

Autism, and the Omnibus Cases

I am sure the autism epidemic came from vaccinations. I won’t try to defend that here and of course you need not accept such a hypothesis. But we can look at the way the government dealt with autism claims.

Many parents told their doctors that trouble started soon after the MMR immunization (a combined injection of vaccines against measles, mumps and rubella). The immediate reaction included such things as fever, listlessness, crying, and diarrhea; a further reaction included standard symptoms of autism, such as loss of acquired speech, social withdrawal, and self-harm.

Since autism did not appear on the Vaccine Table, there was no guarantee of payment. Litigants had to prove the causal link between the vaccination and the illness. By 2008, nearly 5000 families were saying that the MMR vaccine had caused their child to have a developmental disorder. The court chose to combine all autism claims into one, calling it the Omnibus Autism Proceedings.

Instead of judges, the NCVI law set up “Special Masters.” These were not physicians or chemists, yet their task was to make a determination as to causality. They decided to divide the Omnibus claims into two groups. One group claimed that thimerosal, a preservative used to give vaccines shelf life (i.e., to kill bacteria), was the culprit. Another group claimed that it was specifically the mercury, within the thimerosal, that was doing the damage.

The result, except for the Hannah Poling case, was that the Omnibus claims were defeated en masse. Three judges heard the first group by using “test cases.” The selected children in the first group were: Michelle Cedillo, Colten Snyder, and Yates Hazlehurst. This test case lost, no ‘causality’ having been found. The court had the gall to rebuke doctors for having misled the parents!

Two of those first three appealed to the Circuit Court and lost. The second group had William Mead, Jordan King, and Colin Dwyer as its representative children. That case lost and they did not appeal.

Unjust Procedures

Now get a load of the way in which that newly created court, in 1988, deviated from judicial norm:

  1. ‘Discovery’ is not available (you can’t subpoena your opponent’s records).
  2. The masters are appointed for four-year renewable terms. (Think about it.)
  3. Attorneys can be paid even if the case does not win. (A lose-win situation for law firms!)

and — fasten your seatbelt —

  1. The main physician opposing the parents was not subject to cross-examination.

Note: the injured party can opt to reject an award offered because of The Table, (presumably hoping for more $$); if he does, he’s then allowed to sue manufacturers in regular state court. But now see what happened to Hannah Bruesewitz.

Wyeth

The following is from the syllabus of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 (2011).

“Hannah Bruesewitz’s parents filed a vaccine-injury petition in the Court of Federal Claims, claiming that Hannah became disabled after receiving a diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine manufactured by Lederle Laboratories (now owned by respondent Wyeth). After that court denied their claim, they elected to reject the unfavorable judgment and filed suit in Pennsylvania state court…. Wyeth removed the suit to the Federal District Court.

“It granted Wyeth summary judgment, holding that the relevant Pennsylvania law was preempted by 42 U. S. C. §300aa–22(b)(1), which provides that “[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings. The Third Circuit affirmed.”

At SCOTUS, the ruling was affirmed. Scalia wrote the opinion, with Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Breyer joining.  Fathom it! Sotomayor dissented, with Bader-Ginsburg joining. Consider — while you recall Bill Gates statement that his vaccine business returns “twenty-to-one” — the following statement from the ruling:

“Taxing [Pharma’s] product to fund the compensation program, while leaving their liability for design defect virtually unaltered, would hardly coax them back into the market.”  I say they would never have needed to be coaxed.

A Somewhat Different Set-up for Victims of Covid Vax

Regarding the infamous Covid vaccines, of Pfizer and Moderna, I mentioned that 2005 PREP Act created a Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) for emergencies. We have been in an emergency since February 2020.

In a Forbes article dated November 4, 2021, Adam Andrzejewski stated that the legal payout is as follows:

“Each person with a ‘provable’ injury from a Covid vaccine could claim up to $379,000 from a special Covid vaccine fund set up by the federal government. [The amount is related to lost employment at $50K per year.]  The payout for death could be as high as $370,376.”

In October 2021, a piece at the Congressional Research Service said:

“To encourage expeditious development and deployment of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency, the PREP Act authorizes the Secretary of HHS (the Secretary) to limit legal liability for losses resulting from the administration of medical countermeasures such as diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines. In a declaration effective February 4, 2020 (the PREP Act Declaration), the Secretary invoked the PREP Act and declared COVID-19 to be a public health emergency warranting liability protections for covered countermeasures.” [Emphasis added]

Today, at the website of Health Resources and Services Administration, I found this:

As of January 1, 2023, the CICP has rendered decisions on 496 COVID-19 claims.

Total COVID-19 CICP Claims Filed: 11,065

  • Pending Review or In Review: 10,569
  • Decisions: 496
    • Eligible for Compensation and Pending Benefits Determination: 14
    • Denied: 482
      • Requested Medical Records Not Submitted: 39
      • Standard of Proof Not Met and/or Covered Injury Not Sustained: 81
      • Missed Filing Deadline:104
      • Not CICP Covered Product/Not Specified: 25

The Situation in Australia

The website health.gov.au, last updated June 2022, says:

“The scheme covers losses or expenses of $1,000 and above due to administration of a TGA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, or due to an adverse event that is recognised to be caused by a COVID-19 vaccination.

“See Services Australia for more information about making a claim under the COVID-19 vaccine claims scheme, including:

“Our COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme policy contains full details of requirements.”

There are 4 COVID-19 vaccines currently in use in Australia:

Like all medicines, vaccines can have side effects (also known as adverse events). Almost all of these are mild and resolve within a few days.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) closely monitors vaccine safety. It often finds that adverse events or suspected side effects are not caused by the vaccine itself.

In rare cases, some people may suffer a severe impact after a COVID-19 vaccine.

Commentary

Notice how the justice system falls apart to suit the “needs” of mega-corporations. In the US, both the legislature and judiciary went AWOL.  I think we have to say that government is working only for certain elites and not for the population.  Worse, since the pandemic, and the autism epidemic are, I believe, planned genocides, it is reasonable to say that the US government is warring on us.

For Australia, one can blame the Parliament and the monarch. (Per the Australian Constitution, the monarch sits in Parliament, but you know what I mean.)

In both countries, even when there was ostensibly a way to compensate persons for damaged health, “The Powers That Be” saw to it that, instead, the hopeful litigants got crazed with the frustration, pressure, and finally the defeat of their efforts.

I would start by impeaching judges. Of course, the persons doing the impeaching are the equally hopeless legislators, in US. In Australia, only the viceregal Governor-General can effect an impeachment of a judge.

I would impeach the three judges still on the Top Bench who ruled against Ms Bruesewitz’s Seventh Amendment rights, in Wyeth. Sure, a Pennsylvania law stood in the way and judges are adjudicators, not lawmakers, but they could have declared the Pennsylvania law unconstitutional. Roberts, Alito, and Thomas need to get their comeuppance.

You can’t have a Constitution and not have it at the same time. It’s one or the other.

Take your pick.

SHARE

38 COMMENTS

  1. You are only able to access the constitution if you meet the technical requirements outlined in the book Fruit from a Poisonous Tree by Melvin Stamper.

      • “Thomas Jefferson cautioned us that ‘freedom is not free; the price you must pay for freedom is eternal vigilance.”
        As a people we have for many years been apathetic to the Congress, the President and the Judiciary, so much so that we never noticed the subtle, diminishing changes that were occurring to our freedom, right in plain sight. We have not been vigilant.
        Somewhere along the way this plan for a republic went dreadfully wrong. Without any constitutional authority, the republic was transformed into a democracy. Now the President makes law by Executive Order, again without constitutional authority. The Congress is powerless because of fierce partisanship and the constant pursuit of money from the international corporations needed to perpetuate their political lives. The result is that they do nothing to check and balance the other runaway branches of our government. The agencies that were created by Congress to make and enforce regulations and administer the draconian laws of the Congress and the Executive branch now answer only to the diseased, corrupted body of the Executive branch, which answers to no one but the international cartel of bankers, philanthropists and senior level policy wonks.
        These incomprehensible laws of Congress, especially the taxing statutes, are patently unconstitutional in their application to the citizens of the fifty states. But this seizure of the productive people’s wealth for the benefit of the non-producing minority and the imprisonment of those who resist this theft have been ratified by a corrupted federal judiciary and Supreme Court. That briefly sums up our present day democracy and the state of the union.”
        https://archive.org/details/fruit-from-a-poisonous-tree/page/n11/mode/1up

  2. Gumshoe “trending” just reprinted an article that quotes Sen Malcolm Roberts:

    “In May 2020 I criticised fear-driven response to COVID in the Senate, within months of this mismanagement of COVID. At that time Senator Hanson and I were the lone voices of dissent in the Senate, and Craig Kelly and George Christensen were the lone voices in the other place, and Senators Rennick and Antic joined us—six representatives out of 227 people.

    “Everyone else in both houses displayed an ignorance of proper scientific process, an inability to read empirical data and a misplaced trust of health bureaucrats. Health technocrats have spent their entire professional lives working closely with the pharmaceutical industry. And we expected them to be impartial. Come on!”

      • 3 things: Govt propped-up Priivate Religious schools which sell opium to their masses and teach mindless obediance to authority

        • That falls under “education”
          There’s no such thing as a private school or hospital in Australia; if they didn’t do as they’re told they’d be closed down

          • “There’s no such thing as a private school”. Nonsense. that’s privileged propaganda speaking. Tell that to employers, and tell it to universities who draw on these private institutions for the greatest bulk of their student intake..98% of working-class kids from public schools never get to go to UnI (Anderson Report)

            “.If they didn’t do as they’re told they’d be closed down”….What specifically are they told, by whom specifically and how and when specifically? When they are not being told what to do what are they doing then?
            The State robs the public schools so private schools can realize their infrastructural advantage and pay their staff obscene wages in comparison to Government wages tieirs.. The Government merely blackmails the private schools by making them dependent on public handouts while robbing the poor to pay for these mostly-Christian religious institutions which teach religious propaganda alongside standard curriculum. Christian ideology underpins the majority of Western capitalist nations. .
            Standardized curriculums gives us that what is called mindless obedience to authority. Religious schools take it one step further by teaching authority to the teacher class, to the priest class, and to an external entity. It’s all opium for the masses either way,. just laid on thicker in private religious schools. Arguably, private schools just toss up more tameness and conformity: They dangle both the Damocles sword of ‘Eternal damnation”, as well as the suspension protocol, over the student’s head if they don’t obey their pedagogical gurus.

            https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/education/inequalities-baked-into-australia-s-education-system-20221118-p5bzj8 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/23/if-you-thought-the-disparity-between-private-and-public-schools-was-bad-you-were-wrong https://www.isdenver.org/newspost/~board/adcellerant-blog/post/private-school-vs-public-school

            STATISM…. WHY WE OBEY AUTHORITY NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO

          • You’re apparently oblivious to the fact that:
            1) There’s no such thing as a learning facility that doesn’t inculcate what you call “religious propaganda”: no form of knowledge can be imparted in a spiritual vacuum, not even math

            And
            2) The blueprint for Christianity leaves no scope for children in their formative years undergo said process in any institution, irrespective of the label:

            “These words I am commanding you today are to be upon your hearts.
            And you shall teach them diligently to your children and speak of them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. “
            DEUTERONOMY 6: 6 – 7

            And
            3) No institution that’s dependent on any sort of external support can be called “private”

          • I am noticing that your cement-like certitude is possibly hindering your ability to differentiate. Not sure that that is healthy or wise. An obsession with quoting scripture as an answer for everything is becoming tedious because it gives the impression that not only are self-righteous anf full of it, but that you disdain anyone who draws your attention to it ordares question your logic. Scripture only works on those others who have been equally brainwashed enough to hear.. otherwise it muted message falls like drops pf water in a desert of deaf ears. Have you practiced talking without absolutes?

      • Seems like the poor boy doesn’t quite ken what he’s up against:

        Notwithstanding it’s hard to imagine anything so pertinent issuing out of the mouth of “our” leader of the opposition

        • Poverty is relative…it can also mean poverty (narrow or impoverished mindedness) .re the insbility to see any other point of view other than one’s own. In this regard it takes on elements of sociopathy as rigid and rule-enforced ideas are used as weapons to strike another .. .in order tto mete out some form of punishiment ..eg bible bashing another or calling them ‘ poor boy’. Here rigidity and single mindedness have elements of the pathological and demonstrate the need to be proven right at all costs…often found among the privileged idle rich who have an overblown and misplaced sense of entitlements which is measured by accumulation of fetishuzed material possessions ( Habitas.. Bourdieu).

  3. So the U. S. has a “Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program”

    One more piece of evidence that, despite all it’s flaws, it’s still the best place to live on the planet

  4. It appears to me that if you got the jab then you voluntarily contracted, however the MANDATARY has responsibilities according to the Law Dictionary.

    Mandate is not law! – The People’s Government
    http://www.thepeoplesgovernment.com.au/mandate-is-not-law
    A mandate is not law, and must be agreed upon by the mandatary. Simply remove your agreement and it doesn’t apply to you. In addition, mandates, orders, guidelines, policies, ordinances etc only apply to PERSONS. PERSONS are fictitious entities, corporations, not men and women.

    ……………..

    MANDATE Definition & Legal Meaning
    Definition & Citations:

    https://thelawdictionary.org/mandate/

    In practice. A Judicial command or precept proceeding from a court or judicial officer, directing the proper officer to enforce a judgment, sentence, or decree. Seaman v. Clarke, 60 App. Div. 416, 69 N. Y. Supp. 1002; Horton v. State, 63 Neb. 34, 88 N. W. 146.

    In the practice of the supreme court of the United States, the mandate is a precept or order issued upon the decision of an appeal or writ of error, directing the action to be taken, or disposition to be made of the case, by the inferior court In some of the state jurisdictions, the name “mandate” has been substituted for “mandamus” as the formal title of that writ In contracts. A bailment of property in regard to which the bailee engages to do some act without reward. Story, Bailm. jj 137.

    A mandate is a contract by which a lawful business is committed to the management of another, and by him undertaken to be performed gratuitously. The mandatary is bound to the exercise of slight diligence, and is responsible for gross neglect. The fact that the mandator derives no benefit from the acts of the mandatary is not of itself evidence of gross negligence. Richardson v. Futrell, 42 Miss. 525; Williams v. Conger, 125 U. S. 397, 8 Sup. Ct. 933, 31 L Ed. 778.

    A mandate, procuration, or letter of attorney is an act by which one person gives power to another to transact for him and in his name one or several affairs. The mandate may take place in five different manners,…………………….”

    From Noah Websters 1828 Dictionary –

    GRATUITOUSLY, adv. Freely; voluntarily; without claim or merit; without an equivalent or compensation; as labor or services gratuitously bestowed.
    2. Without proof; as a principal gratuitously presumed.

    • Do WA’s emergency health powers allow forcible testing, vaccination and removal of underwear of children? Here are the facts
      RMIT ABC Fact Check
      Posted Wed 17 Jun 2020 at 9:12am
      https://www.abc.net.au/…/fact-check-wa-emergency-powers-vaccination-covid-19/12349842
      The Law Reform Commission’s Dr Cox said children could be forcibly tested and vaccinated at school, but it was unlikely. “Theoretically they could, but it’s not going to happen,” he said.

      https://www.wa.gov.au/government/publications/public-health-act-2016-instrument-of
      Public Health Act 2016 Instrument of Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Poison [SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) VACCINE – COVID VACCINATORS – CHILD AND ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICE] (No. 3) 2021 PDF (161.17KB)

  5. I just got my wife back from the hospital. I couldn’t believe it, if any profession must know that the MASKS are useless it should be the medical profession. – The only place I needed to wear a mask was in the freaking HOSPITAL. The medical profession has totally lost the plot with this Covid nonsense.

    • Terry..the marks are INTEGRAL to the plot. Along with the fake and threshold-manipulated PCR tests, they figure prominently in selling the endless propandistic fear campaign which ultimately keeps the coffers topped up, and the gullible prostrating themselves to the false god called Science. For doctors, and their hand-maiden nurses, have elevated themselves to priests in these fear-consumed secular societies, and wearing the mask (while demanding others do also) is not only a sign of their own willingness to prostrate themselves to this false god, but sends a signal to any potential medical heretic who dares disobey that medical Coventry awaits.
      Masks help to sell the bald-faced lie, based on a stupid, but calculated, bio-medically slanted assumption, that an exogenous “virus’ presents a clear and present lethal danger to the miraculous God-made endogenous immune system of humans. And, just like the well-positioned stethoscope around the shoulders of the white coat, it has its parallels in thevpointed hat and staff of the corrupt clergy.
      To those who can see through the theatre, and who do resist such nonsense though by refusing to bow down, the mask silenty signals that the inmates are in charge of the asylum. Sich realization should serve to stiffen their resolve even more and should bolster their desire to never do what these charlatan medical Simple Simons demand of us.

      • “………..it has its parallels in the v pointed hat and staff of the corrupt clergy.”

        Why is The Pope’s Mitre Shaped Like a Fish? – Inicio
        https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican138.htm

        https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_vaticano/vatican138_01.jpg

        Dagon – Ancient Levantine Fertility God | Mythology.net
        https://mythology.net/others/gods/dagon
        Who Is Dagon? The Philistines, a community of Canaanites, were an Aegean people who settled on the southern coast of the area we now know as Israel during the 12th century B.C. Their pagan god Dagon, also referred to as Dagan, was a fertility deity who eventually morphed into an important Semitic god.

        • ‘Christianity as we know it – a state-sponsored and protected religion with legal and corporate status – did not exist before the year 312, when Roman Emperor Constantine removed proscriptive laws against Christians. In truth, the Christian religion is not the creation of Jesus Christ, but of Constantine, who invented the entity called the Roman Catholic church when he granted it legal incorporation in the year 317.From then on, church Bishops became imperial advisors and trustees, and the Roman army marched into battle under the so-called Christian emblem, the Labarnum, symbolizing the union of church and Empire. Realistically and factually, Christianity was born in the fourth century in Rome, not three hundred years before in Palestine. This fact is suggested by the absence of any literary or archaeological evidence of Jesus or his movement, the continual reference of historians, Christian and “pagan”, to the “birth” of the church under Constantine, and the emergence of the Latin Vulgate Bible only after the establishment of the Constantinian Church that would become known as the Vatican.

          “Perhaps even more convincing is the fact that the Church of Rome, and all Christian churches since then, actively repudiated the core teachings of the one called Jesus of Nazareth – non-violence and love of one’s enemy – in favor of the Imperial ethic of “just war” devised by Bishop Augustine in the decades right after Constantine. This rejection of Christ by Roman Catholicism is symbolized in the church’s early adoption of an official image of a murdered Christ impaled on a cross, and displayed itself in every papal endorsement of Holy Wars of conquest and extermination that followed. Considering its origin as a wing of Empire, it is hardly surprising that the Roman Catholic church became that Empire as Rome decayed during the fifth century.
          * ** As such, the church inherited not only the terms and symbols of the Roman Empire, but the aforementioned philosophy of Christian Superior Dominion and “sanctification through slaughter” from Greco-Hebrew traditions, armed now with the full means of Empire.
          As early as the years 401-417, the head of the church of Rome, “Pope” Innocent the First, declared the papacy to be the supreme head of all worldly authority, and as such, could establish and depose any government, conquer any kingdom, and rule over all peoples of the earth, whether Christian or not. A deadly force had entered the world: an Empire imbued with divine self justification, claiming total authority over humanity, and believing that it was superior to all other faiths and sanctified as such by the conquest and destruction of the latter. It was this force known as Christendom that formulated and enacted the plague known as European Genocide.”
          Steve Newcombe. ;Pagans in the Promised Land’ 2008)

        • “Today the Gentile Christians who claim of holy right have been led in the wrong path. We, of the Jewish Faith have tried for centuries to teach the Gentiles a Christ never existed, and that the story of the Virgin and of Christ is, and always has been, a fictitious lie. In the near future, when the Jewish people take over the rule of the United States, legally under our god, we will create a new education system, providing that our god is the only one to follow, and proving that the Christ story is a fake…Christianity will be abolished.” (M.A. Levy, Secretary of the World League of Liberal Jews, in a speech in Los Angeles, California, August, 1949
          .
          Jews and Catholics both wear a Yarmulke symbolising their worship of Baal the Sun God alias Nimrod the founder of Babylon……

          Subverting the Church: Judaism, Kabbalah and Vatican II

          Judaism and Vatican II
          Jules Isaac (1877-1962), a French Jew who pioneered the Judeo-Christian Friendship Association, was among those who worked alongside the Second Vatican Council to subjugate the Church to Judaism.

          https://www.transnotitia.com/subverting-the-church/

          The “Jews” definitely believe in the existence of Jesus, the Father of Christianity.
          .
          Jesus in hell where His punishment is “boiling in hot semen.” (Talmud, Gittin 57a; Exhibit 202) The subject is identified as Jesus in a footnote, also in the Jewish Encyclopedia under “Balaam.” (Exhibit 275)
          .
          Christians in hell (in the above passage) are punished by “boiling hot excrement” which is the punishment for all who mock “at the words of the sages” (i.e. the Talmud).
          .
          Jesus “committed bestiality,” “corrupted the people,” is “turned into hell.” (Talmud Sanhedrin 105a; Exhibit 106 and Exhibit 107)
          .
          Jesus “limped on one foot” and “was blind in one eye,” “he practiced enchantment by means of his membrum,” “he committed bestiality with his ass,” he was a fool who “did not even know his beast’s mind.” (Talmud, Sanhedrin l05a-105b; Exhibit 108 and 109) The ridiculous and foul misuse of Judges 5:27 about Sisera’s dying convulsions meaning sexual intercourse is here applied to Jesus, with a footnote “explanation” of Judges 5:27: “This is taken to mean sexual intercourse …”
          .
          Jesus attempts to seduce women, is excommunicated by a rabbi and then worships a brick, was a seducer of Israel, and practiced magic. (Talmud, Sanhedrin l07b; Exhibit 117), also the Jewish Encyclopedia (See Exhibit 277).
          .
          Jesus is cited in the index of the Sanhedrin portion of Talmud, “chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud” (See Exhibit 43), which shows the page numbers where He is denounced. (Exhibit 118)
          .
          Jesus’ resurrection is cursed: “Woe unto him who maketh himself alive by the name of God.” (Talmud, Sanhedrin 106a; Exhibit 111)
          .
          http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt03.html

    • I am sick of all this navel gazing with philosophical, and religious self righteous claptrap.
      Before YOU ALL DREAM OF JUSTICE, GET the evidence.
      It abounds all around if one looks, some have actually looked and reported here.
      Now stop dreaming, for a start see what legal action is actually afoot.
      Try Renz interviewed at BIN IN THE LAST DAY OR SO.
      Then there is the usual reports by Mary at situation update at BIN. Try about the 47 min mark, from memory.
      As I reported to mm by e-mail, I am passed Mary. SORRY, but we could have ww111 and kids have been tortured abominably and that has to be exposed somehow. The material IS THERE FROM VICTIMS.
      Research takes more than 7 minutes looking at video evidence.
      Without evidence, there is NO CASE.
      Ok, finished my rant, who wants to line up next?
      I will off ‘a waltzing’ with my rocking chair…… without AA.

        • Well I posted some of that stuff above and didn’t get any feedback at all so I can’t even say if anyone much looked at it

          • I actually share both of your concerns and desperation re the events that are happening.. as well as recognize the unwillingness of most commentators here to offer up practical ideas or solutions…( few have any real idea what is actually going on or how to deal with it..they cant even agree on who the goddamn enemy is!) Then again GS has the appearance of an ‘intellectual’ wank room of sorts most times…..too many heads are stuck in law books, or too many are righteously quoting ancient scripture to be effective at anything else than providing, intellectual, self-delivered word orgasms for the idle rich or intellectually ineffectual. For more practical solutions I suggest Telegram channels…perhaps GS needs to become a monthly review paper more befitting of those who need something to read every so often when they are stuck on the toilet. For as a practical ‘how to’ journal or MS ual offering practical solutions to everyday problems it isn’t even the running. Usually, heads roll when questions are asked in any other failing publishing exercise..and the first heads that roll are the ones of floundering leadership who steer the ship against the tide of resistance, and instead into status quo turbulant waters of wanking legal and scriptural impotency.

          • And you shouldn’t throw stones if you live in a glass house…especially not is you timidly play the centre against the sides for personal leverage…
            Twice in posts to 2 separate articles I posted links to an article which revealed secret Australian Government figures to OECD revealed the excess death rate from the jabs was actually up 5176% on 2020 death figures..making a mockery of official figures of a 17% jump. Do you think it even got one comment from this crew? Nup..not a peep….so what is the function of GSN then? Distraction?
            Why the surviving spouse of an ex vaccine-pumping GP, MM, even declared that she didn’t know that the so-called Spanish Flu was caused by vaccines. Say what??? To supplied evidence by me that it was, the resident ,pathological mismatching, sceptic bibliophile E.B. said to her knowledge that no one in the alt-truth movement had verified that. Say what.? Authority freaks abound on here. This is the kind of leadership I am talking about…..and the followers chime in like OlDavids’ galahs. No wonder he and Ned are besides themselves with frustration. If I had said maybe that the guys who spread the vaccines that created the epidemic in 1918 were pedophiles, I would have at least got a response from DD and DM ..for that is their narrow default lane….except their obsession with suggesting long posts which challenge them are generated by AI. Attention fact checkers! Whatta friggin’ joke..

          • I appreciate the publisher’s hospitality and everyone else is a guest. My opinion is you should put forward at least one article to show how good you are because tearing strips off people doesn’t qualify. I challenge you now, do an article about how the Assanges are a psy-op, with references and proofs.

          • Long-winded articles are passe…the province of a by-gone era. I know, I used to bust a gut to write them. They mean Jack S..t. these days. Especially in publications where articles are posted almost daily so there is little real time to do measured responses before the machinery starts again with another article. . Most readers who own a smart phone have the attention span of about 8 seconds. A goldfish scores higher. Communication is only as good as the ears it falls on. Why would I want to tear strips off myself and just be accused of having generated it by AI means anyway? The strip tearing started with Mary counting the number of words in my posts, and continued with under-hand accusations that they were AI generated by Ned, D.D. and Simon. Such long posts challenged their usual throw-away retorts. Was that not strip tearing? Is not apologizing just more of the same strip tearing? Is it not rubbing salt in the wounds when I denied it? Accusations are thick…apologies are thin. A one-eyed man in king in a blind world. What is ‘proof’ anyway?
            Calling you….You write any article…..perhaps an article on Assange being a goodie-goodie and reference it. My post had heaps of links….including one relating to the so-called Marathon bombing F.F.. Start with looking up who Dan Sumner is…he is Assange’s US military-deployed body-guard. The world is made up of appearances….people put on any old clothes and pretend they are something that they are not. You might want to investigate the sterility aspects associated with Ivermectin and wonder just how so many were conned into taking another Big Pharma lab-made product as if was a natural alternative prophylactic for a COVID-19 ‘virus’ that doesn’t even exist. GS pushed its safety until I posted about the side effects and deaths noted world-wide using the WHO figures themselves. Still GS pushed its use. Some eskimos will line up for blocks of ice if you advertise them right. I’ll be looking out for that article Joe…it will be a marked difference to the hit and run, dip in-dip out rhetoric of late

            George Carlin – It’s A BIG Club & You Ain’t In It! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nyvxt1svxso

          • No, those excuses aren’t good enough, you have the Assange barrow and you need to push it to market, it’s not negotiable, so hurry up I’m waiting.
            Ps Don’t take MM too seriously, she is extremely erratic and focussed on her own specialties which include why the law is good + why the law is bad + why are all these martyrs on death row + who did all the massacres … etc.
            We all have our own little barrow to push and I can’t push yours, I don’t know anything about it, but I’m often interested in the opposing view.

  6. THE CORPORATIZATION OF SCIENCE: PEER REVIEW IS A SHAM

    “Today Science is up on a pedestal. A new god has appeared; his high priests conduct the rituals, with nuclear reactors, moon-probing rocket ships, cathode tubes and laser beams. And their territory is sacrosanct; laymen are denied entry”  – Bruce Cathie

    “Peer review is a form of censorship, which is tyranny over the mind. Censorship does not purify; it corrupts…There is a lot of junk science and trash that goes through the peer review process.” “Peer review is a form of censorship, which is tyranny over the mind. Censorship does not purify; it corrupts…There is a lot of junk science and trash that goes through the peer review process.” Gary Novak

    “The mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer review was any more than a crude means of discovering the acceptability — not the validity — of a new finding…We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong.” Richard Horton
    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” .Dr. Marcia Angell

    “The reason for this disaster is too clear: the power of money. In academic institutions, the current dynamics of research is more favourable to the ability of getting grants — collecting money and spending it — than to scientific imagination or creativity.” Marc Girard

    “Peer review? Tthere might be a small chance of correcting some of the corruptions through truth and criticism; but the process is cloaked in the darkness of anonymity…Due to the exploitive and corrupt process, nearly everything in science has official errors within it…[A] culture of protecting and exploiting the errors creates an official reality which cannot be opposed.:” Gary Novak

    Journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry”, wrote Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, in March 2004. In the same year, Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, lambasted the industry for becoming “primarily a marketing machine” and co-opting “every institution that might stand in its way”…Jerry Kassirer, another former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, argues that the industry has deflected the moral compasses of many physicians, and the editors of PLoS Medicine have declared that they will not become “part of the cycle of dependency…between journals and the pharmaceutical industry”

  7. Bravo gumshoe-ers -super sleuths
    for elspeth
    “You’re apparently oblivious to the fact that:
    1) There’s no such thing as a learning facility that doesn’t inculcate what you call “religious propaganda”: no form of knowledge can be imparted in a spiritual vacuum, not even math”–agreed
    Education of the Soul: Love and Joy

    “Not only the mind and the body were part of Tagore’s comprehensive education, but also the soul. According to Tagore’s philosophy, love is the most important path to reaching full humanity, because it connects us with the world and therefore expands our consciousness from the ego to the soul. This produces joy (ananda), which Tagore often used synonymously with love.[62] Tagore often used the Sanskrit term bhakti when he talked about love, but also the Buddhist term maitri, which means “universal sympathy, which is intellectual as well as emotional. [63]

    Tagore proclaimed that the main reason why he can teach children, without having any qualifications, was that he knew how to make them happy.[64] His aspiration was to fill his students’ hearts with joy and love. He recognized that emotions, and particularly joy, are a precondition for successful learning – not only because they make learning less strenuous, but also because they enable the learner not only to know but to properly assimilate information.[65] Tagore’s education for love and sympathy included love to God and humanity (ethical and spiritual education), love to others (peace education) and love to nature (environmental education). We will now look into all these areas in more detail.”

    and anon 100% agree
    Richard Horton
    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” .Dr. Marcia Angell

    “The reason for this disaster is too clear: the power of money. In academic institutions, the current dynamics of research is more favourable to the ability of getting grants — collecting money and spending it — than to scientific imagination or creativity.” Marc Girard

    “Peer review? Tthere might be a small chance of correcting some of the corruptions through truth and criticism; but the process is cloaked in the darkness of anonymity…Due to the exploitive and corrupt process, nearly everything in science has official errors within it…[A] culture of protecting and exploiting the errors creates an official reality which cannot be opposed.:” Gary Novak”

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.