Home News Covid 19 Moot Court Trial of Person Charged with Genocide, Treason, and...

Covid 19 Moot Court Trial of Person Charged with Genocide, Treason, and Development of a Biological Weapon

47

Photo of album on ebay.  But this article is not meant to be funny

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

This article gives the Prosecutor’s Opening Statement in a moot court trial. The accused, Mr X, could be any one of several well-known players in the vaccine field .

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury,

You will be hearing about three charges brought against Mr X, per the Grand Jury indictment dated December 20, 2021. These are: genocide, treason, and development of a bioweapon. I’m going to read you what the law says, as many citizens think these crimes are only to be used in connection with a foreign enemy.

Genocide

In 1987, Congress passed domestic law against genocide; it was called the Proxmire Act. It says:

Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such — kills members of that group; causes serious bodily injury to members of that group; causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members … or subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part “…. will be punished.” [18 USC 1091]

Furthermore, “Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.”

I will show you how Mr X meets the criteria of killing and causing bodily injury to a national group, namely Americans, by medical malice connected to vaccines. He may have done something similar overseas as well, but this trial is not about that.

Treason

As you can see, Mr X is an enemy to his own people, and thus the charge of treason is appropriate. The Framers of the United States Constitution defined the crime of treason and left it to Congress to codify it as law, which it did.

That law says: “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States,” meaning any citizen or resident, “levies war against them” — meaning against the states, “is guilty of treason.” [18 USC 2381] I’ve omitted the part of the definition that talks about giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Maybe there is a globalist enemy but the charges in the Grand Jury’s indictment do no refer to that.

In the 245 years of this nation, no citizen has been brought to book for levying war against the people, other than during the Civil War of the 1860s. But the time is now. Treason has been committed, blatantly. Over a hundred million Americans have been injected with a harmful substance.

Possession of a Bioweapon

The third charge against Mr X is development of a bioweapon. The bioweapon here is a substance that alters a person’s DNA. Mr X may try to justify the use of it by saying it does have a peaceful purpose. But even if some potential good can come from it, it would have to be voluntarily accepted by the recipient in full knowledge of potential harm to herself and her progeny. To date, no recipient has been voluntary in that sense; the harms are not well understood.

The law says: ‘Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon…shall be fined or imprisoned.” [18 USC 175]

I will be showing you that Mr X has been planning his treasonous genocide by encouraging the development and stockpiling of bioweaponry. He often boasts of it, albeit without using the word “weapon.”

The Three Elements of a Crime

Before finding an accused guilty of a crime, it is important to determine that he had the means, the intention, and the motive.

Mr X had the means, as he is very wealthy and has minions, as well as upper-level contacts, in many parts of government and science.

He had the intention to carry out the treasonous genocide, as he has worked on it more or less openly for decades.

He also had a motive, but this will be hard to prove. The prosecution will argue that the real motive for the medical malice is to reduce the surviving population to slaves. They will be under mental control and economic control. “Getting control” has been a well-established motive for many leaders in history.  In this case, it not only assures Mr X of having servants, it guarantees that the government will never act to blame him. He will be protected.

That third element of the crime, the motive to gain control over American society and government, is a reason for us to act quickly while we still can. Today, Mr X sits here in the dock. Gaze upon him. Be prepared for the opening statement by the defense. You will be told that Mr X is a good man. But I am telling you he is a criminal.

It would not matter if he’s the friendliest guy in the world, or if he talks a good game. Crime is crime and it is your duty to discern if he committed any of the three crimes — genocide, treason, and possession of a bioweapon for other than peaceful purposes.

Witnesses

The Prosecution will bring dozens of witnesses. This is so you will know what really happened. The final burden on you is to determine whether Mr X committed the three crimes with which he is charged. Many witnesses will tell you only that the crime was committed, not who did it. That’s all right; it is not their job to know everything.

You must piece together what the witnesses say. Also, you jurors are the deciders of whether a particular witness is truthful. Naturally if you think the person is deceitful you should not credit his or her evidence.

It is incumbent on me as Prosecutor to point out to you that in a treason trial there is specific wording in the Constitution’s Article III. It says “No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.” First, in regard to confession, Mr X has pleaded not guilty. Still, at any time he can change that to “Guilty.”

Second, in regard to the word “overt,” where two persons witness an overt act, this means a physical act, not a mental act or a conversation. The reason this was put into the Constitution was to make it hard to convict a person of treason, as there were instances in England when the charge of treason was made rather glibly. Even to have harbored a bad thought about the king was punishable as treason. Note however that in law a written statement is an overt act.

When Judge Smith is giving you instructions before you retire to deliberate the case, he will go over this constitutional matter with you. For now I assure you that it is all right to listen to, say, a video in which Mr X states his wish to vaccinate the population. That might help you decide that he is guilty of the crime of genocide or possession of a bioweapon even if you may not use it as evidence of treason because conversation is not an overt act.

Facts

It is a juror’s duty to listen to the facts and not be swayed by emotion — either for or against the accused.

In 1770 we had a trial of British soldiers who killed four colonists in Boston, which became known as the Boston massacre. John Adams, a lawyer, was not personally inclined to favor the British, but he was the lawyer for those soldiers and brought to light anything the jury could use make up its mind about guilt.  John Adams said:

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”

But now I must prepare you for the large number of witnesses who are scientists and will most likely say things that are opposite to what another other scientists say. This case is about genocide by means of a poison, as it were. Was the poison really poison?  I myself am not knowledgeable about how the chemistry of the human body works. I have recruited, as prosecution witnesses, persons who are able to show evidence that the body is poisoned by the Covid injections.

Also, since Mr X has been involved, in the past, in promoting other vaccinations that are harmful, witnesses will show how you can make connections between the past and the present.  This will not constitute double jeopardy for the accused — he was never tried for any of his past activities. Whether or not those activities amounted to genocide, treason, or possession of a bioweapon is not for you to determine.  Mr X is on trial today only in regard to vaccines pertinent to the so-called Covid-19 pandemic.

Didn’t the US Government Sponsor the Vaccination Program?

It is unlikely that Mr X will try to proclaim innocence on the basis of his having obeyed government rules, as his self-image appears to be one of superiority to any government.  However, even if he did claim that he was only following orders, this is not an excuse at law for the commission of any crime. Nor is duress — though, again, it’s unlikely Mr X would say he was pressured to do what he did.  If he does claim pressure, this can be considered in the sentencing phase of the trial. For now, you are at the fact-finding phase of the trial.

The background landscape of governmental involvement in this crime is probably impossible for you to ignore. We are here in the United States, reading daily bulletins about the Covid disease, the Covid treatments, the Covid prevention program.  It all sounds beneficial, or at least it uses the language of benefit, with phrases such as “protecting the public” and “improving one’s health.” That background should be ignored by you as much as possible. It does not bear on the case.

Granted, the poisonness of the poison, as laid out by prosecution witnesses, does bear on the case. You may end up rejecting the poison idea, in which case you must find Mr X not guilty of any of the crimes of genocide and treason. AS for development of a bioweapon, we will hear evidence about that.

If, however, you accept the poison thesis, and convict him of crime, what will this do to the government’s program? It does not directly change it. However, the jury would more or less be nullifying existing law of vaccination. Again, though, that burden should not rest on your shoulders.  You are here to perform a limited function.

Go forth and do that job with diligence, reasonableness, and above all, courage.

SHARE

47 COMMENTS

  1. I suspect there will be no objective history of the 2019/2026 sliver of human existence. But if there were to be, the preamble would go something like this…

    “The most remarkable aspect of the public response to the globalist covid-19 bluff and its creation of a socio-economic noose, ever-tightening to force compliance with mRNA intervention mandates, was the continued universal belief in the Rule of Law and Integrity of the Judiciary, despite clear evidence that the global elite driving the campaign had entirely jettisoned any regard for Law… State, National, or International.

    Thus, energy and resources that might have been applied to overthrowing the tiny and vulnerable club of local despots, and thereby ending the democide, were flagrantly dissipated on popular protests, rallies, and legal challenges.

    By the time it was realised that legal struggles were part of the globalist diversion strategy, elements of the police or army that might have assisted the civilian rebellion, had been discarded and dispersed beyond reach.

    Humanity paid a dear price for clinging to an obsolete belief system.”

    From The ‘Global Covid./Reset Papers’, Department of Foreign Affairs, Uttar Pradesh., 2027.

  2. Bulletin – I liked your comment Tony

    I can’t get into the eschatology but this guy said some very insightful things (video embedded)

    “A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.”
    ― St. Antony the Great

    Orthodox Priest Calls COVID Narrative an Antichristian Fallacy – “We Need to Start Fighting Against This!”

    https://russian-faith.com/opinion-trends-explaining-orthodoxy/orthodox-priest-calls-covid-narrative-antichristian-fallacy-we

    • Comment … Ilyin again –

      “In fact, what would “non-resistance” [to evil] mean, in the sense of the absence of any resistance? This would mean accepting evil: letting it in and giving it freedom, scope and power. If under these conditions the uprising of evil occurred, and non-resistance continued, it would mean subordination to it, a surrender of the self to it, participation in it, and finally, turning oneself into its instrument, into its body, into its cesspool, its playing, an absorbed element thereof. ”

      “On Resistance to Evil By Force” by Ivan Alexandrovich Ilyin (1925 – Chapter 2)

      • “IIlyin: If under these conditions the uprising of evil occurred, and non-resistance continued, it would mean subordination to it, a surrender of the self to it, participation in it, and finally, turning oneself into its instrument, into its body, into its cesspool, its playing, an absorbed element thereof.”

        Like ditto man. Like ditto city.

        • Romans 12:17-21

          17 Repay no one evil for evil. Have regard for good things in the sight of all men. 18 If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men. 19 Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord. 20 Therefore

          “If your enemy is hungry, feed him;
          If he is thirsty, give him a drink;
          For in so doing you will heap coals of fire on his head.”

          21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

          • Some passages later (maybe) but Ilyin stresses that you should not respond to evil with evil (i.e. malice in the heart) but that force (the sword being the last resort) is sometimes necessary to quash the evil so that it doesn’t take hold and become (the new) normal.

          • That’s right; it all boils down to individual motive.
            The “turn the other cheek” narrative is about not taking personal offence because retaliating in kind just adds fuel to the Adversary’s fire

          • Most people would be loath to acknowledge that the current situation is largely due to the “personal rights” ethos of the Age.
            But believing that somebody or some entity owes you just gives he/she/it undue power
            Small wonder that the concept is completely alien to both the old and new testaments: each and every one of the commands is, in fact, all about fulfilling personal duty/obligation

    • “A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.”
      ― St. Antony the Great

      Julius, i just copped a mouthful along that line from a close relative a few minutes ago.

    • Cherri, 10 bucks on top of what? I mean what does a pharmacy get per jab with this increase?

      As for doctors, what is the total pay per jab, and does the doctor also to Medicare for that time?

      • Pharmacy prices usually depend on whether they are in the rich area or the cheap area but I would guess a roughly normal pharmacy markup of 100% on wholesale would apply, wholesale injection price has been mentioned as roughly around $10 so the retail markup another $10 and then Scotty’s xmas bonus another $10.
        I don’t think Scotty found a horse head in his bed, I think his (and McGowan’s) game is, “it hurts me more than it hurts you”.
        Conversely I would guess someone in the Trump clan probably got the horse head.

    • He calls it a war but at 3.32 he says we must win it non-violently.

      Have you seen this Tony? He says “they” have no moral authority. They include (as pictured) Tony Abbott, Scomo, Julie Bishop, Bill Gates, Dan, Gladys and Rupe.

      Bosi seems to have moral authority. Tony, you have moral authority. So does Cherri.

    • I almost choked when I heard this former senior judicial figure talk about our traditional fundamental rights. Crikey, it is because the judges have been denying those rights and principles under English Law that this situation has developed.

      Don’t piss on my head and tell me it is raining.

      https://gumshoenews.com/2018/06/19/review-of-australian-law-and-its-decline/

      Wait until this ‘judicial review’ he refers to has a judgement that can be read by the man in the street. I predict the sophistry in the judgement will be as rational as the ‘health officer’s’ decisions were. – At least it will give a few more names to send to the gallows.

  3. Forget the judicial system which has become just as corrupt as those who actively take part in this 21st Century Holocaust. Military Tribunals are the only way forward.

    Tune into Truth Media and Technology Group this coming February, if you wish to know what is coming, and that cannot be stopped. WWG1WGA!

      • Wow I wonder what the black market price will be if I invest $700 in a handful of “Paxlovid™” (peace-love-ID) pills. Maybe Swissy has reconsidered his bio-weapon rollout and is morphing it into an expanded Covid-19™ product range instead, while SPARS2025™ is in development, and the internet is brought under tighter control.

        Meanwhile, I’ll see you and raise you, now look at this flashback from the 80’s and recall how we were so happy with some abandoned urban decay back then, and how coddled they are these days, It all has to be lined with Ikea™ now.

    • The supply of the Pfizer pill will initially be short. Right so all the galahs will race out and pay big prices to stave off something that does not exist. And these scams keep on coming.

      I was thinking this morning what advantage to the human species is IA. Maybe I have hit the answer right here. At least 50% of humans need an implant of AI so they can function as human beings.

  4. All masonic political leaders here are reading scribes written by Doherty Institute (as they tell us at beginning of every msm broadcast). This eugenics society based in Melbourne University is the head office of the 5 bio-weapons security labs in Oz, 3 in Victoria and 2 in Queensland. These simple facts alone are enough to see the obvious, shame most are born without heads these days. Our governments are at war against we the people, because all institutions have been taken over by serpents for a century and more.
    Medical martial law – first noticed after 911; go to the medical centre doctors mainly from Indian subcontinent, go to emergency young doctors mainly British, get sent to specialists mainly Zionists, go to operating table surgeons CCP !
    Friends, they are all connected masons and that’s how it works here. All we have left of ‘freedom’ is Bunnings Coles Woolworths Aldi and Liqourland, all supervised by Serco head orfice telling us to stfu line up and take the genocide jabs. This is what Oz has become, their final solution.

    Resist with all hearts and minds, do not accept the BS.

    • Tony. you might find whole historyof interest –a few excerpts– for others
      “This eugenics society based in Melbourne University is the head office of the 5 bio-weapons security labs in Oz, 3 in Victoria and 2 in Queensland.”

      Australia the Ultimate Experiment.
      Psychiatry an Industry of Death.
      Tavistock Agenda:. We need a cadre of psychiatrists to infiltrate every organisation Institute and agency.

      A Seventieth Anniversary History

      Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences The University of Melbourne
      1946 to 2016

      https://psychologicalsciences.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/2153440/Final_Digital_Version_Web_Quality.pdf

      The establishment of psychological science at Melbourne

      When one considers the early history of psychology at the University of Melbourne the words of Kurt Danziger, a distinguished former staff member, appear rather apt: “[it has a] long past but a short history.”2 As an independent department, psychology arrived relatively late at Melbourne – later than at Sydney and Western Australia, later than in the United Kingdom and much later than in the United States. However, the teaching of psychology and psychological research at Melbourne dates back well before the turn of the 20th century, when the University was a comparatively small institution cultivating the state’s intellectual elite.

      “Oeser’s pre-war Dundee project had set Eric Trist’s early career in motion, with Oeser recruiting him as key researcher. Trist would become a founding figure in the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations established in London after the war. Like the Tavistock Clinic, the Institute was dominated by psychoanalytically-oriented thinkers. In 1958 Emery joined the Tavistock Institute, after a Damascus-like conversion to analysis, and become a hugely influential figure in organisational psychology. Emery and Trist developed “open socio-technical systems theory” as a new paradigm for organisational design — field-tested on a national scale in Norway, in collaboration with Einar Thorsrud.”

      “The Melbourne department enjoyed good relations with local external agencies in these early years. The Education Department allowed testing work to be done at schools; likewise, the Lady Gowrie Kindergarten. Hospitals such as the Royal Children’s, the Alfred, Prince Henry’s, Royal Melbourne and Royal Park allowed students to attend psychiatric outpatient clinics and provided supervised instruction in Binet testing.”

      Page 25

      “Laboratory set up in one of the huts, dated 1952. The department’s experimental program was established by Kurt Danziger, who arrived in August 1951. The photo middle bottom depicts an “open field” for mapping the movement of hooded rats. The photo middle top is possibly Danziger. (Donated by Lionel Sharpe to the APS, University of Melbourne Archives.)

      • Diane,
        Thank you for heart felt humility, always.
        My late father was given electric shock therapy, multiple times in psychiatric hospitals, suffering depression because developers sucked his skills, blood and money dry, for no reason other than him doing good works. He was gifted with arts and crafts like MichaelAngelo, sculptures in mum’s home testimony to the genius in his seven fingers. For decades they juiced him up with lithium, largactyl and we were unable to do anything because the shrinks were in with the crooks. By his mid seventies, the pharmaceutical poisons had zapped the pure loving natural strength he generated to everyone. In the end, twelve years ago, they gave him a lethal injection, murdered him and I didn’t stop them. My guilt follows me every minute of every day. It’s a Masonic kabal and they are all connected.

  5. “The great reset: ‘Re’ in Italian means king, ‘Set’ is another name for Satan! So the great reset means the great king Satan!”

    Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

    • The usual suspects:
      “Set, also known as Seth and Suetekh, was the Egyptian god of war, chaos and storms, brother of Osiris, Isis, and Horus the Elder, uncle to Horus the Younger, and brother-husband to Nephthys. His other consort was the goddess Tawaret, a hippo-headed deity who presided over fertility and childbirth.”
      From Egypt to Swissy the trail is always there, the eye on the pyramid, the pyramid on the Australia Parliament House, the pyramids and Egypt stuff in the masonic temples, the WHO in Geneva, the UBS in Zurich, the BIS in Basel, the activities in medieval Venice, the Swiss Guard in the Vatikan, it’s all laid out, only the wilfully blind cannot see.

      • More people have died from vaccines this year, than in the past thirty combined.
        Interesting to note, politicians here are exempt from vaccine mandates.

        • Ant, got a citation for the pollies’ exemption? I’d like to see how they would dare to word it.

          As for your father, the apple falls close to the tree. Stop with the guilt already! We had no insight in those days.

  6. Synagoga’s Blindfold: Its Symbolism

    The Symbolism of Synagoga’s Blindfold

    • Synagoga is blinfolded, not to see the Messiah.[1]

    • In pre-humanist tradition, the blindfold signified a disability.[¿]

    • The female figure of blindfolded Synagoga, which adorned many late medieval churches, was a visible and public testimony and reminder of the failure of the Jews to recognize their Messiah. With a veil or blindfold covering her eyes, and sometimes holding a broken standard which served as a contrast to the victorious Ecclesia, Synagoga was a permanent sign of Jewish blindness and stubborness, which had led Jews to murder their unrecognised saviour.[?]

    • Synagoga is blinfolded, as Jews refuse to see that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah, and so that Judaism has become obsolete.[+]

    • The blindfold represents moral or spiritual blindness or darkness, sin, and ignorance.[2]

    • Covered eyes once had negative connotations. A blindfolded and bent figure, Synagoga, representing the Old Testament, denoted that Judaism was blind to the light of Christianity.[3]

    • Synagoga is blindfolded, symbolizing the blindfold her blindness to the truth of the New Testament.[4]

    • The blindfold symbolizes exclusion, for the Jews had rejected the Messiah and medieval Christian culture held the Jews irredeemably responsible for killing Christ.[5]

    • Synagoga is blindfolded, because she has not yet recognized the revelation of Jesus Christ.[6]

    Read on –
    http://documenta-akermariano.blogspot.com.au/2015/05/blindfold.html

  7. Nigeria scrapping 1 million va666ines (source al-Jazeera yesterday), nobody wants them, South Africa going the same way.
    This will come out of international aid budgets, so basically Gates & co manufacture for $1m, retail for $20m, paid by the aid budget then dump the serums (sera for pedants) in the rubbish.
    WHO frontman Tedros seems to have survived his genocide charges in the Hague so far and is urging first world countries to set aside more of their aid budget to throw more va666ines in the rubbish.
    A small dose of va666ine propaganda mixed into some South African history:

  8. Anti-mandate politicians in the APH Canberra listed here:
    https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/sending-out-an-sos

    The rest of them are collaborators, notably the Greens Party leader Adum Bent.
    Today we have a mask mandate started here, I just went for a walk along the beach, most people ignoring it. Hopefully the cops are busy arresting some treasonous politicians and crooked medical officers, this would be a good Xmas present for the country.

    • Of course we expect the ALP to be collaborators, from top to bottom. Bob Hawke supposedly born in Bordertown, could just as easily have been hatched out of an egg and transplanted. Rhodes scholar from Perth WA, put the pyramid on top of the APH, used Keating to implement Thatchernomics, universities commercialised, government pensions swapped for privatised “super”, cut ties with English law, the ALP was used for more foundational globalism in this period than probably any period before or after.
      Would you sell your house so you could rent it back and have a more lush lifestyle for a few years ? That’s what the ALP did in collaboration with John Howard. Kevin Rudd made a few efforts in a better direction and was ousted for his trouble.
      The upshot is that Lib-Lab & Greens are all controlled, we desperately need a new Greens party, the old Greens have gone totally globalist, they must be destroyed and replaced.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.