Museum of Florence
By Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) was a bureaucrat in Italy. He was also a comedy writer. He wrote “The Prince” (definitely not a comedy) to advise rulers on how to rule. He lived during the papacy of Pope Alexander VI, and knew the pope’s son Cesare Borgia (who died at age 32). Machiavelli dedicated his book to Lorenzo di Medici, in 1505.
In my 2011 book, Prosecution for Treason, I quoted, from The Prince, the two following examples:
Example 1:
[A] prince may rise from a private station …by some wicked or nefarious ways. Agathocles, the Sicilian, became King of Syracuse …from a low and abject position. This man, the son of a potter, … accompanied his infamies with so much ability of mind and body that, having devoted himself to the military profession, he rose to be Praetor….
One morning he assembled the people and senate of Syracuse, as if he had to discuss with them things relating to the Republic, and at a given signal the soldiers killed all the senators and the richest of the people; these dead, he seized and held the princedom…
Niccolo Machiavelli
Example 2:
In our times, …Oliverotto da Fermo, having been left an orphan …was brought up by his maternal uncle, Giovanni Fogliani…. But it appearing to him a paltry thing to serve under others, he resolved, with the aid of some citizens of Fermo, to seize Fermo. Oliverotto gave a solemn banquet to which he invited Giovanni and the chiefs of Fermo.
…Oliverotto artfully began certain grave discourses, speaking of the greatness of Pope Alexander and his son Cesare…. but he rose at once, saying that such matters ought to be discussed in a more private place, and he betook himself to a chamber, whither Giovanni and the rest of the citizens went in after him.
No sooner were they seated than soldiers issued from secret places and slaughtered Giovanni and the rest.
After these murders, Oliverotto, mounted on horseback, rode up and down the town and besieged the chief magistrate in the palace, so that in fear the people were forced to obey him…. He …strengthened himself with new …civil ordinances. [emphasis added]
Trans. W. K. Marriot. See Constitution.org
So What’s New?
Any political scientist worth her salt today should be able to come up with ideas as to how to seize a government or how to terrify a population. This is the meaning of power, is it not?
It is a mathematical question: How can a few control the many?
Today at GumshoeNew.com, there is a discussion about the Zionist program to rule mankind. I don’t doubt that such a plan may exist, but I do not have evidence that is sufficient to assure me that it’s the particular group of men known as Zionists who are in charge. It could be others.
(See my Gumshoe article of November 12, 2015, “Is It Zionism or Something Else?“)
The key to Zionist control is apparently an event that’s only two and half centuries old – the rise of the Rothschild family. Mayer Amschel, a Jew in Frankfurt, changed his name to Rothschild, which is German for “red shield.” He had five sons who became bankers in cities of Europe. He also had five daughters, and his progeny soon included royalty.
On the Internet one can find “Rothschild’s 25-Point Plan For World Domination.” At the website of Spingola.com, the following text is produced:
“In 1773, Mayer summoned twelve wealthy men to Frankfurt and asked them to pool their resources, then presented the 25-point plan that would enable them to gain control of the wealth, natural resources and manpower of the entire world.”
Those 25 points are:
- Use violence and terrorism rather than academic discussions.
- Preach “Liberalism” to usurp political power.
- Initiate class warfare.
- Politicians must be cunning and deceptive – any moral code leaves a politician vulnerable.
- Dismantle “existing forces of order and regulation.” Reconstruct all existing institutions.” [Wow]
- Remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it.
- Use Mob Psychology to control the masses. “Without absolute despotism one cannot rule efficiently.”
- Advocate the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption and all forms of vice, used systematically by “agenteurs” to corrupt the youth.
- Seize properties by any means to secure submission and sovereignty.
- Foment wars and control the peace conferences so that neither of the combatants gains territory placing them further in debt and therefore into our power.
- Choose candidates for public office who will be “servile and obedient to our commands, so they may be readily used as pawns in our game.”
- Use the Press for propaganda to control all outlets of public information, while remaining in the shadows, clear of blame.
- Make the masses believe they had been the prey of criminals. Then restore order to appear as the saviors. [my fave– MM]
- Create financial panics. Use hunger to control to subjugate the masses.
- Infiltrate Freemasonry to take advantage of the Grand Orient Lodges to cloak the true nature of their work in philanthropy. Spread their atheistic-materialistic ideology amongst the “Goyim” (gentiles).
- When the hour strikes for our sovereign lord of the entire World to be crowned, their influence will banish everything that might stand in his way.
- Use systematic deception, high-sounding phrases and popular slogans. “The opposite of what has been promised can always be done afterwards… That is of no consequence.”
- A Reign of Terror is the most economical way to bring about speedy subjection.
- Masquerade as political, financial and economic advisers to carry out our mandates with Diplomacy and without fear of exposing “the secret power behind national and international affairs.”
- Ultimate world government is the goal. It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, so even the largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments on the day after the great political smash.” [Won’t they be surprised!!]
- Use economic warfare. Rob the “Goyim” of their landed properties and industries with a combination of high taxes and unfair competition.
- “Make the ‘Goyim’ destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest.”
- Call it The New Order. Appoint a Dictator.
- Fool, bemuse and corrupt the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know to be false.
- Twist national and international laws into a contradiction which first masks the law and afterwards hides it altogether. Substitute arbitration for law.” [TPP, anyone?]
– all emphasis added.
I think we can sum up Machiavellianism in four words “The bold man wins.” Or just three words, which would not breach politically correctness: “The bold win.” (Cf William S Gilbert, “None but the brave deserve the fair.”) Perhaps the 25-point plan of Rothschild is not very original…
There is a separate question as to whether “the Jews” drafted the document that is known as “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” It was published in Russia in 1905, but could have been written at a much earlier date.
I think it reasonable to surmise that the Protocols were written by, or used by, persons who in fact proceeded to carry them out. Much of the world today, including the government of the United States, is under the control of a cabal. At least that is how it looks to me. I can’t very well offer official proof!
Everyone should get a load of the Protocols posthaste. We are in dire trouble. Consider just the fact that the protocols say that inoculation will be used to spread disease. I am certain that the original smallpox vaccine was dispensed for the purpose of causing disease, not curing it.
See my argument to that effect in my book, Consider the Lilies: A Review of 18 Cures for Cancer and Their Legal Status. As early as 1875, Charles Creighton, MD, had worked out the chicanery that led to Edward Jenner’s “discovery” of an inoculation for “smallpox.” (The whole science of it was dishonest.)
As early as 1898, Alfred Russel Wallace, FRS, had worked out, from a parliamentary inquiry, that the UK government was knowingly supporting this secret genocide (he did not use that word). Also, in the US, Charles Higgins independently came to the same conclusion in the 1920s.
Please read that material. It’s all freely downloadable from the website whale.to. (Or save time by taking my word for it. Trust me!)
- Mary W Maxwell lives in Adelaide. She thanks Fredrick Toben for sending her the 25 points.
Photo credit: https://instagram.com/p/925VDONhag/?taken-by=museofirenze
Who needs Machiavelli when you’ve got other methods….
Hustle your horse and don’t say die!
Number 11 seems to sum up our Australian ‘leaders’.
How ’bout #4: “Any moral code leaves a politician vulnerable”
A “Machiavellian personality test” is available at
http://personality-testing.info/tests/MACH-IV.php
insights.som.yale.edu. from The Prince
I read this on a Yale website, which says “for Kissinger and Nixon it was preferred bedtime reading”:
“But since it is difficult for a ruler to be both feared and loved, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two must be lacking. For this can generally be said of men: that they are ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for profit; and as long as you serve their welfare, they are entirely yours, offering you their blood, possessions, life and children…when the occasion to do so is not in sight; but when you are faced with it, they turn against you.
“And that prince who lays his foundations on their promises alone, finding himself stripped of other preparations, falls to ruin… For men are less concerned with hurting someone who makes himself loved than one who makes himself feared, because love is held by a link of obligation which, since men are wretched creatures, is broken every time their own interests are at stake; but fear is held by a dread of punishment which will never leave you”.
Hey, and with a boot stamping on the human face forever, everybody’s all set.
a different approach?
Ow dear, the old “who wrote them” trick — rather than, is there any evidence of what was written, being at some stage, and or becoming true today approach.
I do not give a rat’s A who wrote them. Yes they are coming true and that is what’s important.
Dave, some folks seem concerned with identifying who wrote them. To those persons I wish to say: I know who wrote them, as follows:
The persons who wrote them wrote them, that’s who.
Now let’s deal with the consequences!
[…] November 15, I penned “Did Machiavelli Write the Protocols?” Again, my theme is that we always act predictably. Men wanting absolute control over their […]