by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
A quick recap: Part 1 announced the similarity of the August 8, 2023 Mauri Fire to the September 11, 2001 attack on the twin towers in New York, and said Let’s streamline the investigation. Part 2 laid blame on the US government, partly owing to the maxim “Contra spoliatorem omnia praesumuntur.” (He who is tampering with the case is probably the perp.) A revival of intellect was recommended. Part 3 outlined a s Special Grand Jury, to be led by citizens, since government protects itself from liability for its crimes. The relevant maxim is “Nemo judex in sua causa.”
My decision to call our work a “Grand Jury” was influenced by a stunning moment in judicial history. As you may know, the Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Inquiry found an error in the “investigation” done by NIST — National Institute of Standards and Technology. The Committee supported a study done at University of Fairbanks, Alaska that refuted NIST’s findings as to how the buildings fell.
So, as good Americans, they attempted to get this corrected by a court. They wanted to give the Alaska findings to the foreman of the existing Grand Jury in New York City. You had better be sitting down when you hear this. The ruling by the district court was in favor of the government’s (the US Attorney’s) preference to withhold that study. All of this took a long time, and even more time to go to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals — where the district ruling got affirmed.
The US Supreme Court Left Us to Our Own Devices
Wait. It gets worse. The Lawyer’s Committee, represented by Mick Harrison, proceeded to petition the US Supreme Court to hear the case. He posed these questions [bolded by me]:
“Did the … Second Circuit Act Contrary to the Constitution When It Held that 9/11 Victim Family Members, … Needed to Assert Additional Harm Beyond a Violation of a Constitutional Right to Have Article III Standing to Seek Judicial Remedies?”
And
“Did the … Second Circuit Undermine the Constitutional Independence of the Grand Jury When It Refused to Enforce the Mandatory Duty Imposed Explicitly by Congress and Implicitly by the Constitution [5th Amendment] on United States Attorneys to Relay Citizen Reports of Federal Crimes to a Grand Jury, and Left to the Complete Discretion of the Department of Justice What a Grand Jury Is Allowed to See and Consider?”
The US Supreme Court did not take the case. (I mean the applicants did not get the needed four out of nine justices to say Yes we will hear it.) “Smelling salts, Butler, bring me my smelling salts!”
We can’t go higher than the US Supreme Court, so the Alaska study won’t get its day in court. The plain right of people to talk to their Grand Jury foreperson has been blocked. This is not OK and now we have to do what we can.
The Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights says: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury….”
The perps of 9-11 and 8-8 need punishment. We the people can’t be told to shut up and forget about it. Hence I have proposed a citizen-led “Special” Grand Jury.
A Limited Task, and the Guarantee Clause of Article IV
Continuing my theme of simplicity, I now point out that I am not envisioning any kind of help for what the people of Lahaina are now suffering. The local people and many charities are dealing with that. Nor do I mean our group to force Hawaiian officials to produce information as to what happened on August 8, such as by providing a list of the deceased. Also, we will in no way be studying the toxic material on the ground, or the threatened release of mosquitos to the Hawaiian islands.
The Special Grand Jury should contain 23 or more Americans who are willing to start with the premise that both the Mauri fire and the 9-11 WTC attack were caused by hi-tech weapons such as Directed Energy Weapons (these include lasers, microwaves, electromagnetic pulse and maybe things we’ve never heard of), and that the prime suspects are US officials.
It is possible for other people to do a lot more than what I propose, and they will find surprising authorization for it in the US Constitution. Article IV’s section 4 is known as “the guarantee clause” which promises that every state will be small-r republican. That is, it will not be a monarchy, a despotism, or whatever. Here is Section 4:
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.” [Emphasis added]
So far, there hasn’t been any “Application of the Legislature or of the Executive” of Hawaii, or any talk of domestic violence (such as civil war). Thus the second half of the guarantee clause is not relevant. But I think there was an invasion. Technically it’s too late to “protect each [state] against Invasion,” as it has already occurred, but I can imagine a reading of that phrase to imply that we can help them after an invasion.
Anyway, our special grand jury does not need Article IV authority. Our job is to enable the punishing of criminals. No doubt if we are successful, this would itself be helpful to Hawaii, New York, and other states. Yipee!
Whence Cometh Law?
What are the limits of the law in the United States? Is the written law the whole of the law? No.
Think of the law as arising first of all from human nature. Humans seem to be born with a conscience. A child likes to get a look of approval from Mom or Dad and dreads a frown or harsh word from them. Good and bad have endocrine correlates. I believe this eventually got projected outward such that societies formed laws to specify the do’s and don’ts.
Until there were automobiles in the early 20th century, you wouldn’t have seen any law against speeding. When it came about it was natural — and still endocrine-based, I think. The public does not want to get run over by speeders, so to make the situation livable an appropriate official came up with, say, “50 miles per hour, maximum.”
When I was in high school in the 1960s, there was suddenly a civil right movement and along came laws that were truly inspiring, reflecting the power of justice ideals. Society can make the law bend to human needs. This is quite a creative enterprise and should not bog down by “politics.” Probably the ability of “politics” to do this or that is just a disguise for clever powerholders’ tricks of bamboozling our creative lawmaking potential.
In the twentieth century, starting with the Patriot Act, we have all manner of “legal restrictions” that are blatantly illegal, in light of the magnificent US Constitution. We are almost in a police state. the “FBI” can show up at yur door at any hour on any pretext.
Workarounds When the Law Is in Tatters
The correction of bad law is completely within our power. Probably it is diminishing, as children are not taught about it. Let me present three workarounds that ought to be used to combat lawlessness — the law of outlawry, the law of citizen’s arrest, and the law of self-defense. Yes, all of these are LAWS. They are “on the books.”
- The law of outlawry governs outlaws. We associate that word with cowboy-and-Indian TV shows in which “outlaw” simply refers to the bad guy. Technically a person is an outlaw when the law can’t reach him. If, in the wild west, there was no official law enforcement, anyone breaking the law, such as by killing or stealing, was eligible for punishment by anyone.
Society thus made everyone a cop, so to speak. And to give those cops strength, society (in the person of judges or legislators) announced that citizens who helped a baddy escape, or who fed him, was thereby acting criminally. As for your right, or obligation, to remove the baddy from society, there was open season on killing him. This law stands, unless a given state has repealed it.
Today I believe that anyone in the US who is protected by the US Attorney General or any state attorney general is an outlaw. She is beyond the reach of the law — not for lack of cops but for an obstinate decision by officials to prevent indictment of her.
- The law of citizen’s arrest is on the books today for every state. It is unlikely to be repealed as it is the method on which security guards depend. A private guard has no law-enforcement credentials with which to represent the government. He acts for his boss when he arrests you. Fact is, the same holds true for FBI agents. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has no police powers, only investigative powers — although at times an FBI agent asks a local police department to deputize him.
The law of citizen arrest says it is OK to arrest a person whom you know has just committed a felony or is about to commit a felony (not a misdemeanor, the difference being a felony gets a jail sentence). Your quarry can sue you if you don’t do it right. Be sure to tell him you are citizen-arresting him and what for. And tell him he need not speak. Then you must call the real cops to collect him. In fact it may be wise to call the cops before you do the job.
- The law of self-defense is on the books in the shape of being a legal defense you can use if you hurt a person who is hurting you — or someone close to you. Or maybe any vulnerable person whom you wish to protect. The law does not require you to take aggression lying down. Yes, you may get arrested for using force, including lethal force, but you can claim self-defense. Note: if you google for the name of your state and the word “law od self defense” you will find some of the particulars.
Back to the Special Grand Jury
Part 3 of “Operation Piebald” made a case for a citizen-led group calling itself a Special Grand Jury. I suppose it could be called a Truth Commission or a Citizen’s Board, but I am trying to keep it close to the structure of the regular grand jury.
My claim is that the wrongdoers of 9-11 and 8-8 should be charged with crimes, but that the government never allows such government people to face charges. They are protected (and as such may be considered outlaws). Typically, when an A-G or a DA (district attorney, such as of a county) wants to prosecute, she arranges for a grand jury to make an indictment.
As noted earlier, the US Supreme Court in 2022-2023 had the opportunity to prevent the protecting of 9-11 wrongdoers but declined to do so. They “let stand” an Appeals Court ruling that favored the non-transmission, to NY’s grand jury foreperson, of a scientific study from the University of Alaska that shed light on the collapse of the twin towers.
The fact of our being left to our own devices justifies, in my opinion, a reversion to the older structure in which a 23-person group, empaneled for 2 years, looks around for trouble. I cannot find the reason why this old method changed over to one that requires oversight by a prosecutor or a court. (I think federal courts and prosecutors are too united, by the way. You could almost say they “conspire.”)
Today I am not trying to do anything more than set up one particular citizen-led grand jury in regard to two events, those of 9-11 and 8-8. Tidiness may call for the two events to each have a separate grand jury, but tactically I think we will have more success if we combine them.
And there is a uniting factor — the use of high-tech weapons. Since these are invisible it will always be hard to identify the perpetrator du jour. I consider our silence after the Maui fire to be shocking. Naturally, the 9-11 event took a long time for people to understand (the jihadi story made sense), but the use of DEWs to decimate Lahaina was immediately recognizable to many people.
Several websites posted information about it within days. I have been following the YouTube channels of Michelle Melendez, Traci Derwin, and Hawaii Real Estate (Eric West’s site). All these web hosts seem to me to act responsibly. I have only just now found another one called Hustle Bitch, whose host is very articulate, and one called Maui Travels that looks worthwhile.
Will You Join Me?
Please let me know as soon as possible if you are willing to join the Special Grand Jury. My email address is: MaxwellMaryLLB@gmail.com. I live in Concord, New Hampshire.
“We can’t go higher than the US Supreme Court” lol
No stone left unturned, thankyou Mary
Simon, you remind me of the naughty boy at the beach who was mean to the birds.
He left no tern unstoned.
It’s a joy, sitting on a shooter waiting for a few, sharing wink and waves with dolphins, knowing sharks below 2.
Part 1 in this series is classified as “ 9/11 Truth”
Part 2 as “ False Flags”
Part 3 as ”News”
and Part 4 as “Conspiracy”
I guess that’s because they all come under the umbrella of satire
No, Berry, it is an internal tagging system. On a given day, Dee may wish to know how many of our files are on Vaccine, 9-11, Law, whatever. I sometimes notice that the website automatically pulls those together to show “similar” under a new article. “Your recent shopping type thing.”
Berry, If you don’t like what I write, why do you waste your time on it?
To me this stuff is not satire at all. To me the 9-11 false — disgusting — story is that the 19 hijackers did it, and the 9-11 truth stuff is an attempt to discover reality.
Three days from now is my 10th anniversaary of publishing at Gumshoe. I hope it has not all been under a delusioin.
In the instant case, the 4 part series on Hawaii, I figure if we don’t crack down, we are agreeing that it’s OK to obliterate a whole town by fire.
Like I said a couple of posts back:
“As NO baddie theory has ever been known to free anyone from anything they are ALL “controlled opposition”;a cunning diversion tactic from what ACTUALLY needs to be done.”
I dare say most of the proponents are oblivious to being used like so, but that’s actually integral to allowing oneself to be led down any dead-end path
As ALL baddie theories are predicated on the notion that certain head honchos are cognitively in league with each other to the extent of being able to pull off some nefarious scheme or other, they ALL contribute to the very forces of darkness they purportedly abhor
I definitely think head honchos conspire — indeed they sometimes conspire to do good. Who could build the Sydney opera house as a solo effort?
What about Dee’s new book, “The Child Potection Racket”? Did she contribute to the forces of darkness by showing how the nefarious system works?
Shite! Four years of her life down the drain if she did.
What’s not commonly understood is that humanistic opposition to any nefarious scheme is even more destructive than the orchestration thereof. The forces of darkness need to be acknowledged but no more so than the effect of allowing one’s base reactions to run riot, as illustrated so vividly in 99% of self-proclaimed “truther” raves, e. g:
https://operationdisclosure1.blogspot.com/search/label/QAnon
Talk about “controlled opposition” !
The notion that the destruction of the twin towers was based on the same sort of cooperation as building the Sydney opera house just exemplifies fool’s logic
Said advent was actually, first and foremost, a vivid portrayal of a general societal collapse; even if you do manage to win over all the king’s horses & all the king’s men, no amount of trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again is ever going to work
The problem with trying to turn back the clock is that it’s synonymous with missing the Opportunity of the Hour
pass the dead horse for my piebald, please. They can horse around and build bunkers, I’m putting on my tortoise shell hat
best displeasure I can manage from my armchair, I rage and satire
I posted this at rumormill today. Will probably pull my hat out of the ring.
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=233724
hehehe
Dear Readers, Thank you for marching thru the 4 parts with me. I am going to abandon the name “Operation Piebald.” When I started Part 1, I used it because I did not yet have the vision of a Grand Jury. Now that I have it, the grand jury is my main focus.
I think I must also drop the 9-11 aspect and concetrate only on the 8-8 Maui fire. It is unknown to me at the moment whether 23 souls can be musterd for the job.
If you want to talk to me about any part of this project, please send me yr tel number to MaxwellMaryLLB@gmail.com — I’ll show your mine if you show me yours!
“ALL baddie theories are predicated on the notion that certain head honchos are cognitively in league with each other”
Being enslaved by a common demon is clearly the antithesis of anything that could be categorised as conscious co operation
If you have to be a freemason to get appointed as a judge then you have to keep secrets on behalf of your fellow freemasons so if that it’s completely stitched up. Much easier to advance your career this way. What if we all just become freemasons starting age 5.
Interesting how singling out Freemasonry has become vogue
When the same ”issue” is central to every other creed, cult & religion
Not to mention the bulk of individuals who claim to be Christian
I am,of course,referring to self-righteousness
Secrecy being merely a spin-off thereof – just one symptom amongst many others
Freemason secrecy is fundamental, not a product of self righteousness, it is strictly enforced
And that conclusion is based on?
So far as I’m concerned their natty little formula for keeping themselves “safe” from/ in control of others is principally no worse than a myriad other formulas concocted by a myriad other cliques. It’s all about creating a mystique and exploiting fear, both of which are dependent on external support
Contrary to the general tenor on these pages, such external validation is every bit as devilish as the practice itself; imbuing any such culture with power either way is the antithesis of the directive spelled out in the bible:
https://disntr.com/2019/02/05/five-reasons-why-freemasonry-and-christianity-cannot-co-exist/
Australian Courts which have No Jurisdiction
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0247wNyh8C/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA%3D%3D
Just like Freemasonry, they have jurisdiction over whomever cedes them power:
“PAYING TAXES TO CAESAR” (ref. also Matthew 22:15-22; Luke 20:19-26)
“And they send unto him certain of the Pharisees and of the Herodians, to catch him in his words.
And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?
Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it.
And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar’s.
And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s. And they marvelled at him.”
MARK 12:13 – 17
NB: the flip-side of failing to pay heed to said directive(rejecting the Opportunity of the Hour) was a futile attempt to turn back the clock, namely the disastrous 70 A.D. rebellion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(70_CE)
https://thehistoryfiles.com/siege-of-jerusalem-70-ad/
https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/siege-of-jerusalem-ad-70/
Small wonder why there’s been so many attempts to blot out and/or deny the surviving lineage: why would anyone want to be reminded of any such history ?
I am not an American citizen so I am of no help re Special Grand Jury. However as I see the situation in the US as with Australia there is no LAW. If those in position to make the law work are not willing to do their lawful job there is no law.
So we don’t at this stage need police officers, district attorneys, lawyers or least of all judges.
Mal,
Yes, there is no just law here. Merely a collection of poo-bah slavenasons enforcing satanism along with their ritual sacrifice of innocents, mainly children, in thirst of the ‘chrome juice.
We have, via possessed media, all been indoctrinated into a satanic cult. As a result, insensitive to the genocide of Palestinian and Ukrainian children and families worldwide.
Oz has always been an experiment in establishing and enforcing their masonic new world dystopian hell. We are here now, without any doubt, slaves to beasts on all bases loaded.
“Berry, If you don’t like what I write, why do you waste your time on it?”
Mary, if you don’t like the way the World’s being governed,why do you waste your time on it?