Home NWO Top Secret Meeting in 1953  (Fiction)

Top Secret Meeting in 1953  (Fiction)

63
In 1957, the artist Yves Klein got his color “International Klein Blue” patented by the French patent office.

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Chester: Thank you for getting here on time, despite the storm.  Today’s meeting is a kind of clean-up session for what we covered last week. I want you eleven guys to be frank, if you’ve had any doubts or second thoughts about what we have so far decided to do.

And please don’t let good sportsmanship stand in the way of criticizing one another. Yes, we want enthusiasm for the cause, but enthusiasm can lead to accepting ideas blindly in an emotional way.  Don’t do that.

As for loyalty, traitors must be dealt with summarily.  Speaking of which, we can never be sure who is lurking outside our group, can we? Does anyone but us have the knowledge or the drive to beat us at our game?  It’s unlikely but we can’t rule it out.

I”ve asked Tom to be our key man today for military-and-technology, Dave to handle civil governments — so-called, and manufacturers, and Buzz to catch us up on psychology and medicine. Who wants to go first with a headline or two?

Dave: I”ll go first. The civil government situation is working out very well in all but a few areas, such as local councils.  The manufacturers are in lockstep except for one, a children’s toys firm, in which I’ve had to terminate a brick-wall type.

Tom: I’ll go second. The post-war patriotic theme got its big boost from the GI bill; the wives especially are thrilled to be able to buy a house. Technology is slower than planned, but airports are mushrooming all over the place and we’ve got a grip on pilots in regard to loose lips.

Buzz: So I go last. It’s possible that the biggest development, long term, has been our success just last week at the college accrediting committee where we got them to put sociology into the curriculum. That will keep a lot of sniveling little do-gooders busy. In medicine, we’ve had to pay a big sum to get control of three journals, and two others involved terminations.

Chester: Very good, Buzz. I’ve set up the blackboard – and by the way, don’t let any cleaning personnel into the room. As you see, I’ve got three columns across, for the three key areas, and four columns down, in which we will identify tasks that need immediate attention or, if circled in chalk, can be postponed for a year or more.  Start with this one:  civil governments and manufacturers.  Dave said we are having trouble with local councils, so I have written that on the board. What do we need to do, Dave?

Dave: I don’t see a solution. The problem is that the job of town councilor has no primary election in which we can weed anybody out.  In fact, it’s an unpopular job and when a do-gooder hears at the last minute that no one wants it, he can scare up a few dozen write-ins and he wins.  The town meetings are always open so we can’t conduct any real business there and invariably some stupid housewife comes in and says the town library needs more books.

Gerry: Dave, you also said you had trouble with toys.  Have you heard of toy libraries? Tell the housewife to set up a town toy library with one of your problem manufacturers.

Dave: There was only one toy troublemaker and he is no more.

Danny: Hmm. Is the wife onto us?

Chester: No, she was in the passenger seat.

Oliver: What trouble was he giving?

Dave: Nothing direct, if you know what I mean.  It’s just that his designer had come up with a board game that could direct two or more toy cars remotely to sideswipe one another. The owner was ready to open a whole new plant for this toy.  I told him we don’t want kids doing that, but of course my real reason is that we don’t want the public to understand that a remote can cause a real car crash.

Sam: Or a plane crash.  (Laughter)

Chester: We interrupted Dave about town councils. Does anybody have any suggestions?

Gerry: Get the state legislatures to crack down on municipal power. Just limit their job to snow shoveling and garbage pick-up.

Oliver: Run some smears on a few councilors; equate councilorhood with corruption.

Jim: Move their emphasis to the laying of cables for telephones.

Allen:  Whoops. As in whoopsie whoops.  What is our current plan on cables?

Sam: We won’t be able to replace landlines for at least 20 years, so let them lay all the stupid cables they want.

Chester: Looking forward a bit, including 20 years, how are we on manufactures?

Allen: Well, Tom said the wives are thrilled to be suburbanites. So I think we should diversify manufactures to give the gals a lot to think about.  Kitchen appliances, cosmetics, cigarette holders for women only.

Chester: Nothing wrong with that, Allen, but I mean bigger items. Let’s switch over to Tom’s column for a moment – military and technocracy. Gerry, you served in Korea, what’s big?

Gerry: Submarines and radar are major. The USSR is doing rockets – we’ll hang back on our rocketry, which our Nazi’s in Oklahoma are perfecting, and let the Ruski’s put their Sputnik up pretty soon.  Then we will get more money appropriated by saying the Commies are ahead of us – we’ve got a science gap. What a hoot!

Chester: How’s it going for the International Geophysical Year?  I heard Professor James Van Allen wants to toss a few nukes into the ionosphere, maybe in ’57.

Gerry: Of course it’s being called “International” to teach the academics that we do share some parts of science with the Soviets. It is utterly remarkable that they don’t draw the logical conclusion that the Cold War is fake.

Buzz: On that note, Chester, hop over to my column, psychology and medicine. Our psychologists – some of whom are going to have to be terminated, unfortunately, as they know for sure what we’re up to – have created a whole science of public relations. It’s mild brainwashing compared to what we are doing in our own underground gulag.

Sam: Do you mean MK-Ultra?

Buzz:  I mean what we do with our MIAs. I honestly feel bad, since they are Americans. And we will never be able to release them. It’s justifiable though.  We need to study real Americans, those who were physically fit enough to get drafted.

Donny: Are you using them in the cancer program, too?

Buzz: Yes, and we’re matching some of them up to our syphilis experiments in Guatemala. Maybe the MIA guys appreciated that we brought some of the Guatemalan prostitutes here.

Dave:  Where is “here,” if I may ask?

Gerry: Don’t ask.  But does the word “casino” ring a bell?

Brad: We will be boiled alive if the veterans’ associations get ahold of this.

Richard (Dr Richard Day): I have a list of things I am going to try out on people, making it look like a lecture on Futurism. Of course I can’t let it slip that we use MIA’s, but if I say we used the North Korean enemy, no one would object.

Buzz: What are you going to cover?

Richard: First I’ll pitch it that whatever the futurists predict is a sort of natural development.

Sam: You don’t have to bother. People believe that progress itself is good. They think we’ll get color television some day and maybe air conditioners in the home.  Who could object to that?  And the propaganda for any new medical invention is always so positive no one will harbor a second thought.

Allen: Kev Cruikshank told me that we did the Coconut Grove fire in Boston so we could then demonstrate the value of the new antibiotics.

Gerry: Chances are no one will ever get boiled in oil over that, as Boston citizens would never take it into their nog that something like that fire was “strategic.”

Jim: You’re wrong, Gerry. Someone did figure it, a doctor at the Mass General. We had to take care of him.

Gerry: I know there’s a couple of priests who figured out a few things, but we have the goods on them for kiddy fiddling, so there won’t be any risk.

Chester: We didn’t let Richard finish his story.

Richard: Thanks. I have already tried giving my futurist talk to some medical colleagues, throwing in a few things that are totally implausible, but in the context of futurology nothing is deemed impossible. A doubter would be mocked by his peers.

Donny: What’s the thing you are most worried about springing on an audience, Richard?  And remember at the beginning of today’s meeting, Chester said we should all be doubters.

Richard: Well, on the one hand, as Gerry pointed out, I can get away with almost anything.  I don’t advise an audience “Here’s what might be a good thing to have.” I just say “These are the trends and so we should be prepared.” On the other hand, if someone starts throwing tomatoes at me, or gives me a good bawling out, I suspect others will suddenly catch on, and do the same.

Buzz: What about telling them that we already know the cure for cancer but it’s under lock and key?

Richard: That would be hard. At most I could pitch it as a benefit that would counterbalance the population explosion. But if one person in the audience has a sister dying of cancer, he might put a knife to my throat, after the show, to reveal the cure.

Donny: Which item would be the touchiest for you to mention, barring any talk of how we do assassinations, hurricanes, or bank robberies?

Richard: Anything that has a connection to the Bible would worry me. For example, I know we are going to move eventually to a cashless economy for purposes of central control. If I hint to the audience that this means you carry some sort of mark on you, folks in the Bible belt might be very pleased – Hurrah, a prophecy is being fulfilled in our very lifetime! Or they may get angry.

Sam: Chester wants us to stick with a 20-year framework, but really we’re in this for the long haul. I know that we plan, down the road, to give the masses a familiarity with Satan. Does anyone have any suggestion as to how we might feed this in gradually?

Chester: Which column do you want me to put this in?

Sam: Maybe psychology. Maybe technology.  With technology, you could actually make ghosts appear.

Donny:  I vote psychology. I work on the Dumbing-down-of-America school curriculum. A couple of generations from now there will be no ability to think critically.  A concept such as Satan can be introduced in any way. Rumors can circulate that the red devil has been spotted at parties. A blockbuster movie about demonic possession of a whole town would do wonders. And we are already starting to send some Lucifer material to universities for their use in philosophy and theology classes.

Dave: I wager some of us will be invoking the reality of Satan’s guiding force, if our agenda happens to get exposed.

Chester: All right, men, it’s time for our midday break.  When we reconvene this afternoon, we must get down to the One World Government stuff and a polio epidemic planned for 1955. It will cripple a lot of children and lead to public demand for a vaccine. That vaccine, which has been on the drawing board since 1937, will seed the whole population with cancer that’ll knock folks off when they reach their sixties. (Applause)

Enjoy your lunch.

SHARE

63 COMMENTS

  1. Fiction ….. or is it ?

    I assume the ‘Buzz’ guy is Buzz Aldrin, seeing as he’s already hoodwinked the bulk of Americans on that alleged celestial misadventure.

    Donny could be Rumsfeld, Allen could be Allen Dulles, Oliver could be Oliver North.

    Richard could be the ‘Prince of Darkness’ Richard Perle.

  2. It’s a shame you ‘choose’ to remain hoodwinked on the moon landing hoax Mary.

    Because, ‘the evidence was out there all along’ – as suggested in the clip ‘Justice in the lucky country’, made by a brilliant doco/film producer near and dear to us all.

    For those that haven’t seen it (or choose to remain willfully ignorant – lest it burst their bubble that ‘America the Great’ is a fraud), refer to the video below and decide for yourself whether or not anyone really walked on the moon :

        • Ned, I have heard G5 say he saw the finished spaceship tossed into the ocean, but I need a bit more.

          Mind you I am ripe for the plucking. I am not married to the official account.

          • Mary, sorry I think it was in confidence………..I do not recall any public ‘statement’. However, by saying ‘witnessed’, that should imply a claim to certain circumstances and his observations.

        • Thanks Julius,
          I was on the fence because I did not care.
          However I observed enough to accept G5’s eyewitness account of the ‘capsule’ being released from a US transport plane at high altitude.
          Not prepared to swear on the bible……………did any of them?
          Pretty basic for a witness in any criminal court………..even if they are prepared to lie. Would have been a simple act if they were prepared to lie.

      • Mary, if you don’t have 3.5 hours, at least watch the last 40 odd minutes beginning at 2:49:00.

        This is pretty conclusive proof that the all the scenes of moonwalking etc ( not just Apollo 11 but ALL the subsequent Apollo missions that went onto the lunar surface), were shot in a studio on Earth.

        Also, assuming the Apollo crew really had been on the moon, wouldn’t they be EUPHORIC on their return and chuffed to receive the accolades bestowed upon them ?

        Watch the 2 mins or so from 3:25:00 onwards and witness their EUPHORIA in the post moon mission interview in front of the world’s press.

        I think that says it all.

    • And these are for all you debunkers out there …

      • SNOPES: Here’s a Fact: We Went to the Moon in 1969

      Comment: If we didn’t, then this wouldn’t be a fact … but it is – with a capital F.

      https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/07/11/heres-a-fact-we-went-to-the-moon-in-1969/

      • SNOPES: The Moon Landing Collection

      “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for conspiracy theorists.”

      https://www.snopes.com/collections/the-moon-landing-collection/

      Where else do you think they got that petrified wood that they sent to the Dutch museum, huh?

      And there is no evidence that those telemetry tapes were needed anymore, anyway.

    • Re those opening scenes … (von Braun barely gets a mention – he deserved more)

      von Braun was fixated with the concept. His mentor Hermann Oberth was a technical advisor on “Woman on the Moon” – Fritz Lang

    • For those who have made wagers on the Presidential election outcome should take General Flynn’s advice from about the 28 min mark for three minutes or so. I am taking his counsel, Ha!

      • After Flynn says his nonsense at 28, the narrator tells us that Rep Budd and 42 Reps are asking for the fences to be removed outside “Parliament” house, so to speak. Then the narrator, whose voice I cannot abide, says something about “entering sovereign territory.” Nay, not so. Congress controls all of Washington, DC.

        In case anyone want to know how to use “erection” in a sentence, here it is in Constitution Art I, sec 8, clause 17:

        “The Congress shall have Power to… exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings.”

    • Then how come the ex-president has announced that his lawyers will not discuss “the stolen election” during the Impeachmentent trial?

      Und wo ist Frau Powell?

      I don’t want to bother with this. Life is short and getting shorter.

        • I’m so over this ‘moon hoax’ disinfo. Here’s a more recent video of explanations of some of the issues around the moon landing.

          There’s heaps more if people really want to understand the science of these trips to the moon. As I have said, Apollo 13 was my favorite – now that was HEAVY as far as the guys getting with the science needed to ‘succeed’, which in that case was ‘survive’.

          I doubt whether America today could achieve even a simple repeat of the former lunar landings – there would be way too many gender studies, diversity and crazy-making fruit-loops in the mix to be able to focus on the mission.

          • I mentioned Apollo 13, here’s a short video on it. You can watch the movie, but I really enjoyed Lovell’s book, first called ‘Dark Moon’ and later ‘Apollo 13’ as it gives a much more in depth understanding of how he became what he was (and the fork-ups he made) and how that mission went.

          • I’m with you Terry.

            This disinfo that man walked on the moon 50 years ago is a bit much to take when even with the technology that exists today, in 2021, it’s no sure thing they’d be capable of doing it :

          • If the moon landing was faked they would have fixed up the audio “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind”.
            Actually various arctic explorers and submariners and test pilots have performed more risky feats. How about explorers such as Magellan, vikings, polynesians and so forth in their little boats.
            If nobody gets through the Van Allen belts how can the ETs do it.
            Some say nobody can get outside the atmosphere, I saw the ISS go overhead about a year ago and it was huge.
            I went outside to look, nobody else could be bothered.
            Trouble is there was moon mania then, lots of stuff was being done in studios at the same time and it is being conflated. Stanley Kubrick is saying “something” about moon landings in his lacklustre film “the Shining” but exactly what.

        • Mary,
          I have a ‘puzzlement’.
          The Senate is running the impeachment as I understand.
          Means that they are ‘impeaching a PRESIDENT.
          How can they do that if the Senate does not firstly regard T as the President?
          As a simple peasant, I can not fathom that?
          ’Help⚖️⚖️⚖️

          • If they cannot, by what procedure should a ‘ex President ‘ be required to turn up? But if he is the President, then he should???
            As for Washington DC (about ten Sq miles) was it incorporated in 1871 and registered in a foreign jurisdiction.
            So many puzzles that I do not understand!

          • If W DC is a foreign entity and found to be a belligerent entity to the USA interests by proven belligerent antI-USA activities by certain persons, is it possible that they be considered belligerent persons and hanged ( as terrorists? For example)
            I do not understand.

  6. MARTIN BRYANT AND DAMIAN BUGG

    OK. Since the Comments Section is now a free-for-all, let me say that I have been looking for an item in the Code of Hammurabi for a while and have just found it:

    “If a man has made allegations against another man, and he has laid a charge of homicide against him but is unable to substantiate his guilt, the one who made the allegations against him shall be killed.” (Translation by H. Dieter Viel)

  10. Mary,
    Excuse my question please, but I do not understand the conflicted reasoning behind fencing off WDC ( allegedly a separate corporate space) with reported (in videos) attendances on the fence perimeter with so many law USA enforcement vehicles, buses etc descending on and going into the fenced off perimeter and departing continually with passengers and trolleys.
    Please, by favour, explain! If possible.

  11. Mary,
    Last theoretical question.
    If the military under the US constitution be now empowered by a past ‘president’, who is running the US and if they had evidence of belligerents occupying a belligerent space,( eg. under proven foreign interference, via foreign fraud in a democratic election) what would the military be required to do under their oath to the Constitution?

    • As Al Haig once said, your question is too suppository.

      I don’t accept the premiss that Wash DC is foreign. Ned, think of the Constitution as a contract. In the actual contract of 1787, it is provided that Congress alone is in charge of the 10 sq miles or less of capital territory. Yes there’s a Capitol police but their only authority comes from the US legislature.

  12. Mary,
    The link refers to a report by Lin Wood.
    Whilst you opine that General Flynn is ‘nonsense’, what do you make of our colleague Lin Wood from the 20 + minute mark. He must be crazy surely? …….. in your opinion?
    https://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2021/02/death-by-firing-squad-pence-first-must-see-blistering-latest-interview-with-lin-wood-3225214.html

    Oops, I mentioned hanging…….But ‘firing squads’ were approved recently ago in the US.

    Interesting that Wood as a lawyer has done some medical negligence cases, So have I.
    The cases when alleged medical experts under OATH call something as black and another as white, was a professional dilemma for decades. Obviously one was a liar.
    HCL mentioned by Wood.
    It is trite to observe that governments with the msms and their sponsors also LIE LIE and LIE.

  13. OK, Arlyn has the record with about a third of the comments in a recent article. He is a challenge. however I will try my best, being handicapped by dealing with current relevant and historic events.
    (:–]

  15. Summoning Arlyn …

    • Were the Jesuits Crypto-Jews? Did They Stem from the Kabbalist Alumbrados?

    https://www.winterwatch.net/2021/01/were-the-jesuits-crypto-jews-did-they-stem-from-the-kabbalist-alumbrados/

    • Secret Instructions of the Jesuits

    http://www.reformation.org/secret.html

    • The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews

    https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/38170/9789047444114_webready_content_text.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

    • Julie, WHAT?
      Nooooooooooooooooop!!
      That damn pirate ship Arlyn will appear again over the horizon on our starboard with a broadside of rusty old cannon balls tearing out our rigging and we will flounder again.
      There he be on approach with full sale
      All hands to starboard to fend off marauding pirates. Prime starboard cannon, load and fire at will.

        • Arlyn puts up some really good stuff but he is very manic and seems to be fixated on some Bechamp anti-germ theory thing like those people who say all illness originates in the cells and maybe can only be transmitted psychologically or whatever, it’s a hard sell if there is truth in it and there may be partial truth, that it can or does happen that way, but also the conventional way works empirically for 90%+ so the “alternative facts” is tilting at windmills, it doesn’t advance getting the “old normal” back from the communist fascist Davos crowd.
          I would not be bothered trying to change the world, the world will change itself according to technology and so forth, and individuals will find themselves up some side-track of history. Energy is better directed toward the issues at hand.
          Which are: stop the virus hoax, stop the fascist world government from selling its noveau-serfdom to the Libtards.

    • Excellent post, w3. Thank you! One Nation dare to grapple the BIG issues.
      Personally I experienced severe disappointment relating to Malcom Roberts’efforts re the paedo list. I shared a petition by Belinda Curtis (change.org) seeking to get the release of the suppressed ‘list’ with some ten close friends and NOT ONE was bothered to support it. SAD indeed. Seems it Won’t get their attention until they are personally affected – Like so much other stuff. I’m ok, Jack. No blinking wonder we are where we are today. Hats off to Rowan Dean and those daring to call it as it is.
      Folks, dare to share w3’s link! Just 11 minutes.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.