by Mary Maxwell, LLB
Today I was very happy to rock up at the US Courthouse and “deliver my quiver.” I have been collecting arrows for a long time, without a specific person or entity to use them on. This week, however, when I was busily composing my argument against the current war on Iran, I suddenly was able to identify mine enemy. To wit, the judiciary.
Not that I haven’t attacked them before. Some of the arrows have a judge’s name on them in big, bold letters. But it had not struck me till now, that whatever you might blame on the other two branches of government — a lot, a lot— you could blame instead on the courts. Why? Simply because if they did their job, if they carried their weight as thinkers, certain evil players would not get away with what they have been getting away with.
For this article at Substack.com, I’ll print the six exhibits that I included with my appeal. The case is called Maxwell v President of the United States. I will print the whole appeal soon. But let me share with you the six exhibits. I am not the author of them. Here are their titles:
Exhibit A. Legal Maxims Pertinent to This Case
Exhibit B. George Orwell on the Real Purpose of War
Exhibit C. Laurent Guyénot on How the Iran War Started
Exhibit D. Trevor Aaronson on the FBI as Terrorism’s Agent Provocateur
Exhibit E. Terry Shulze on Magna Charta and the Rational Basis Test
Exhibit F. Philip Allott on Possible Future of a ‘Society of Societies’
B, C, and D are plain ammunition. A, E, and F are intellectual treats. But they all go together so well, at least to make the point I needed to make regarding today’s outrageous war. (Specifically, I yelp about the judiciary’s rather stunning unwillingness — for the last 50 years — to “say what the law is.”)
I’ve been unable to find a contact for Trevor Aaronson, but his 2013 book contains masterful evidence that most of the talk about Muslim terroristm is of …um… dubious validity. In fact, I learned that the FBI employs a term I had never heard: JMSU. “Just make shit up.”
The Exhibit by Terry Shulze doesn’t talk about war or about government criminality. It’s about his effort to relieve the harm done to a farmer by a simple, pointless law in New South Wales. I won’t spoil it by telling you the results. Terry’s insight into law is profound.
All right lets’ get into it. I promise that Latin appears only in the first exhibit.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit A. Legal Maxims Pertinent to This Case. (Selected from the Law Dictionary, 1888 – Wesley Gilmer’s 1986 revision of Wm. Cochran Cox’s 1976 edition.)
The niceties of the law are not the law. Apices juris non sunt jura.
It is the duty of a good judge to enlarge his jurisdiction, i.e., to amplify the remedies of the law. Boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem.
He who has authority to do the more important ought not to be prohibited from doing that which is less important. Cui licet quod majus non debet quod minus est non licere.
Let justice be done, though the heavens should fall. Fiat justitia, ruat coelum.
We should judge by the laws, not precedents. Judicandum est legibus, non exemplis.
Law is the dictate of reason. Lex semper dabit remedium.
Law is a rule of right. Lex est norma recti.
The law will always furnish a remedy. Lex semper dabit remedium.
An evil custom should be abolished. Malus usus est abolendus.
Wretched is the slavery where the law is changeable or uncertain. Misera est servitus ubi jus est vagum aut incertum.
Odious and dishonest things are not to be presumed in law. Odiosa et in honesta non sunt in lege praesumenda.
The reason of the law is the life of the law. Ratio legis est anima legis.
Where there are many counselors there is safety. Salus ubi multi consiliarii.
Exhibit B. George Orwell on the Real Purpose of War
Within Orwell’s 1984, is a smaller book written by “Emanuel Goldstein.” It contains this:
The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent….
The primary aim of modern warfare is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living. (in accordance with the principles of doublethink, this aim is simultaneously recognized and not recognized by the directing brains of the Inner Party)…
In the early twentieth century, the vision of a future society unbelievably rich, leisured, orderly, and efficient … was part of the consciousness of nearly every literate person… .the dangers inherent in the machine are still there. From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared. If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations. …
But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction – indeed, in some sense was the destruction – of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared.
If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste.
The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world. Goods must be produced, but they must not be distributed. And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare.
Exhibit C. Laurent Guyénot on How the Iran War Started
(From Guyénot’s May 19, 2026 article “Deep Trump” at radbodslament.substack.com)
Consider how the decision to bomb Iran was made last February, as explained by the New York Times in an April 7 article…. On February 11, a meeting was held in the White House Situation Room … attended by Benjamin Netanyahu, accompanied by Israeli intelligence officers.
Standing before a screen showing Mossad Director David Barnea and Israeli military officials, Netanyahu presented his case for bombing Iran with the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, demonstrating that it would bring down the Iranian regime and thus resolve instantly all the problems in the Middle East in one fell swoop, while making Trump the greatest man in history.
Seated across from him were President Trump, Secretary of War Peter Hegseth, Chief of Staff Dan Caine, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliff, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, as well as Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, unofficial negotiators. After Netanyahu’s presentation, Trump nodded and said, “It sounds good to me.”
The same group met again the next day, without Netanyahu but with Vice President JD Vance, … A final meeting took place on February 26, including a few other people, such as advisor David Warrington, who discussed the legality of such an intervention. [??] Trump concluded the meeting with these words: “I think we need to do it.”
In the meantime, he had had several phone conversations with Netanyahu, who was urging him to act quickly. The next day, February 27, Trump sent the following message from Air Force One: “Operation Epic Fury is approved. No aborts. Good luck.”
[That’s three Exhibits down and three to go. How’re we doin’?]
Exhibit D. Trevor Aaronson on the FBI as Terrorism Agent Provocateur
(from Aaronson’s 2013 book “Manufactured Terrorism,” lightly edited)
After 9/11, the FBI was tasked with recruiting a great number of informants who could check on the lives of Muslims. As a private researcher I became interested in “Muslim terrorism.” My statistics show that in the ten years following 9/11, the FBI and Department of Justice indicted and convicted more that 150 people via sting operations. If these, the FBI not only led 50 of the terrorist plots but also provided all the necessary weapons, money, and transportation.
The justification? By catching a lone wolf before he strikes, federal law enforcement can take hi off the streets before he meets a real terrorist who can provide him with weapons. However, to this day, no example exists of a lone wolf who, unable by himself to launch an attack, met a terrorist and became operational. Granted, an Afghan-American named Najibullah Zazi, came close to attacking the NY subway in 2009, with a plan to place backpack bombs on crowded trains but he had international connections and the ability to carry out the work on his own.
When Obama became president in 2009 he used many sting operations. In three years, his DoJ prosecuted 75 terrorism sting targets. Obama embraced national security as a tenet of his office. He also engaged US military resources in the ouster of Libya’s Gaddafi, and conducted secret wars in Yemen and Somalia. The FBI has become effective in creating the enemy it is hitting.
If the Fort Dix Five, as the media later dubbed them, were terrorists, they were coerced ones – pushed along by criminals who had personal interests in their prosecution. (I know of a case where the informant got $100,00.) Dritan Duka said that in the aftermath of 9/11, Muslims could be arrested just for talking. Bakalli asked the Duka cousins wat jihad meant. It didn’t mean violence, they told him, it was a personal struggle against oneself and a struggle to lead a good life. Soon, the FBI arrested the 5 men and charged them with attempted murder and conspiracy.
The key to conviction was that the prosecution did not have to prove that the Fort Dix Five would do the murder, just that they talked about it. This is the crime of conspiracy. In closing, US Attorney W Fitzpatrick told the jury “We don’t have to prove that they intended to kill.”
This goes against the landmark case Brandenburg v Ohio (1969). Clarence Brandenburg, a Ku Klux Klansman, had given an inflammatory speech in 1964. He was prosecuted under an Ohio law of 1919 that prohibited advocating “unlawful methods of terrorism.” He appealed his conviction to the US Supreme Court where it was overturned – as the government cannot punish speech unless it is intended and likely to result in imminent lawless action.
“It’s official,” wrote Nany Murray, an education director at the ACLU. “There is a Muslim exception to the First Amendment. Actually, the way the prosecutors got around this was by saying that Mehanna’s advocacy of Al Qaeda and violence represented “material support” to the terrorist organization which is against one of the new laws.
At his sentencing in 2012, Mehanna addressed US District Judge George A O’Toole, saying that he was the victim of a vengeful prosecution for his refusal to be an FBI informant. “I have spent the majority of four years in a solitary cell, the size of a closet, locked sown for 23 hours each day.” Judge O’Toole, unmoved by Mehanna’s statement, sentenced the 29-year-old to seventeen years in prison.
Exhibit E. Terry Shulze on Magna Charta and the Rational Basis Test
(From “Review of Australian Law and Its Decline,” by retired barrister Terry Shulze, at GumshoeNews.com, June 19, 2018, lightly edited)
A farmer asked my help as he suffered financially from an Egg Industry Act by New South Wales Parliament. I asked if the law had a rational basis. In the US, an enactment may be invalid if it does not serve a purpose. This is traceable to Heydon’s Case of 1584 in England which searched for “the mischief which the statute was designed to remedy,” i.e., its raison d’etre.
The 1787 case of Bowman v Middleton, was about a 1712 Act of the Assembly which transferred a freehold from to another, without trial or compensation. The Court at page 254.8-held “that the plaintiffs could claim no title under the Act in question, as it was against common right, as well as Magna Charta, to take away the freehold of one man and vest it in another… without compensation, or even a trial by the jury…. That the Act was, therefore, ipso facto, void. That no length of time could give it validity, being originally founded on erroneous principles.”
This ‘rational basis test’ isn’t known by this name in Australia. However, in NSW, the validity of a law can be checked by its accordance with the Colonial Laws Validity Act. I gathered up some early cases, such as MacDonald v Levy (1833). Judge Burton recognized the duty of the judges as the guardians of the rights of the people. At page 49.0 he states:
“I look upon this clause as the great charter of the Colony, and at once yielding to the colonialists all that by the common law, or the liberal, and enlightened, and accumulated wisdom of our ancestors, has been provided for the protection of life, liberty and property, and for regulating the transactions of men with each other. All becomes by virtue of it “the justice and right” which the justices are sworn to do to all the King’s subjects, and is expressly provided in one of the clauses of Magna Charta.”
I found that Judge Wise, in Rusden v Weeks (1861) clearly supports the position of judicial review of legislation of the NSW Parliament:
“…as the supremacy of the law is the characteristic of every constitutional government, it becomes imperative duty of courts of justice, independently of all political considerations, to decide which is the law of the land.”
In general, the early judges (before Australia got its Constitution in 1901) clearly considered that the people of NSW had fundamental constitutional rights, that the courts could declare an Act of Parliament void, that the laws of the legislature must be reasonable and not inconsistent with the Constitution and that the fundamental documents, such as the Magna Charta, Bill of Rights and Habeas Corpus Act comprised parts of the Constitution.
But two things occurred in the latter half of the 19th century in NSW which perverted this thinking. One was a book “The Constitution of the Australian States” by RD Lumb, which said:
“No colonial law was to be void on the ground that it was repugnant to the fundamental principles of English Law.” The other was the reassertion of legal positivism in the form of “Parliamentary sovereignty.”
South Australia’s Parliament had written to Queen Victoria, in 1864, bemoaning:
“the danger and impolicy of leaving in the hands of the Colonial Judges the power to declare the Acts of this Parliament illegal… We, therefore, trust that your Majesty will graciously relieve us from further suffering under this enormous evil… that it shall not be competent for any Judge in the Courts of the Providence.”
The judges’ reply was “No.”
I noted works of Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634). He had said, in Dr Bonham’s case “when an Act of Parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, … the common law will control it, and adjudge such Act to be void”.
Coke’s confrontation with James I, risked his being beheaded by asserting Bracton’s comments that the Common Law protected the King, not that the King protected the Common Law. Coke also said, during the drafting of the Petition of Right of 1627, that “sovereign power is no parliamentary word. … Magna Charta is such a fellow that he will have no sovereign.”
Did I win my challenge to the Egg Industry Act? Some say I did, insofar as a back channel to the NSW Parliament alerted someone to my plans and so they got rid of the Act. What’s more, they legislatively offered compensation. The small farmers in the industry couldn’t believe what happened – they were receiving money instead of being harassed. My client received 1.2 million dollars, of which I never saw a penny. (But earlier I was given a frozen turkey and 4 dozen eggs.)
Additionally, let me mention Justice Moffitt’s 1985 book, “A Quarter to Midnight.” In a chapter on ‘The Separation of Powers: A Decline in Independence’, Moffitt states on page 230, “we will find that in practical terms this constitutional theory is largely but not fully moribund. [Regarding Australia], our principal institutions are in substantial decline for lack of true independence”.
Personally, I think they have further declined since 1985. I know not the reason why each judge takes their path regarding the independence of the judiciary, but it does appear from reading the various cases that, if the judiciary has lost its independence, it is a ‘self-inflicted wound’.
Finally, to Allott’ article. It’s on a matter other than the one on which I (MM) have often quoted him — i.e., his wish that we would all wakie uppy and realise that we can create new circumstances, and don’t have to be so downtrodden for Pete’s sake.
Exhibit F. International Law Prof Philip Allott on a Possible Future ‘Society of Societies’
(This is the abstract of a 2002 book by Prof Philip Allott of Cambridge, entitled “The Health of Nations: Society and Law Beyond the State”.)
The human world is changing. Old social structures are being overwhelmed by forces of social transformation which are sweeping across political and cultural frontiers. A social animal is becoming the social species. The animal that lives in packs and herds (family, corporation, nation, state) is becoming a member of a human society which is the society of all human beings, the society of all societies.
The age-old problems of social life – religious, philosophical, moral, political, legal, economic – must now be addressed at the level of the whole species, and the level where all cultures and traditions meet and will contribute to an exhilarating and hazardous new form of human self-evolving….” “There will be new levels of human energy, creativity, intelligence, to serve the highest aspirations and the highest ideals of all-humanity.
We know that we will be writing a new page in the better story of human self-evolving.” Quoting Friedrich Nietzsche from “Thus Spake Zarathustra”: “Truly, the earth shall yet become a house of healing.” “[Yet also] we are anxious as social systems take power over our minds, our wills, our ideals, finally over our idea of what it is to be human. The globalizing of human society is also a globalizing of human evil.
Note added by Mary Maxwell, Appellant:
Philip Allott served in the UK’s diplomatic delegation at the Law of the Seas Conference, subsequently authoring “Mare Nostrum”. His book “Eutopia: New Law and New Philosophy for a Troubled World” is highly motivating. Allott has now written “World Disorder” about the Iran situation:
“In an interview with the New York Times, President Trump has said that he does not need international law; he has his morality. Stephen Miller and Pete Hegseth have said that power rules the world and the United States is the most powerful country in the world. Thereby they mean to dismiss the obligatory effect of international law in relation to the United States….
“A myth has been gaining traction in recent years to the effect that the world is governed by a ‘rules- based international order’. International law in its modern form has evolved since the late-eighteenth century, with the rise of the modern nation-states and their domination of the world in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The post-1945 new world order was itself made under international law.
“Although international law is obviously itself a rules-based international order, use of the new term unsettles the idea of international law by suggesting that there is something that is different from international law. Its content must presumably be identified subjectively, reflecting the self-interest of the person or agency using the term in a particular situation. It is as if President Trump were to say: ‘I have my own international law’. It cannot replace international law which applies equally and universally to all states.
“The transformation of the United States from being a leader in the making of a new world order to becoming the cause of a new world disorder in the twenty-first century presents the rest of the world with a seismic challenge. Our response should be a calm determination to assert and enforce international law in all relevant situations until the day when the American pariah returns to its senses and rejoins international society as a normal member.”
— end of Exhibits
HEY, FELLOW AMERICANS, CHUCK IN YOUR PARIAH-NESS, WOULDJA?
Note: All thanks to Orwell, Aaronson, Guyenot, Shulze, and Allott. As for the persons who gave us the legal maxims, I really don’t know their names (betcha they were of the male species). There’s something Ciceronian in there, but we mustn’t assume all of them were from Classical times. English courts used a fair amount of Latin. And though textbooks don’t mention it, there was quite a bit of parlez-vous-ing, too.
Please let me know in Comments if you see new ways to bring these Exhibits to bear on your favorite issue.
P.S. In another article, Prof Allott argues “We need a global war-powers resolution.” Heck, I can create a global war-powers resolution right now in four words:
“Don’t do war, jerk-heads.”
For heavens sake Mary, its a pie in the sky, for the judiciary think of “THE MAXIM” or foundation on the root, as a triffle.
You and your arrows are sharp and various for purpose, your release good enough to find mark. Logically a lack of hunting success and coming home with a bone at best is self sabotage or….
the bow is faulty or corrupt is some way (your definitely not stupid, just for clarity, bow=the law)
⨁ maxim non maxim
“you can be the best tradie but when a tool shits itself, and refuses a fix don’t make a federal case, a purchase order is all that’s required”
But I like a ‘federal case,’ Simon dear. I don’t want to order a new constitution. Remember what happened in 1998 at the “Convention for a Republic” in Oz? It was embarrassing.
The solution lies in you and me. And others. If there aren’t enough of us, we’re licked.
Man, this is weird. An hour ago I added a long reply and it did get printed and now has disappeared.
If anyone saw it would you please mention that here. Ta.
Secret Treaty of Verona Explained
The document summarizes the secret Treaty of Verona signed in 1822 between the major European powers of the time to oppose representative governments and restrict civil liberties. The treaty…
https://www.scribd.com/doc/98048067/26687356-the-Treaty-of-Verona-With-an-ExplainatIon-at-the-End
Simon, Just now I asked Google “who arranged for the collapse of the wtc?”
here is the. “AI” answer I got:
AI Overview
The collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001, was orchestrated by the terrorist organization al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden. Nineteen militants hijacked four commercial airplanes, deliberately crashing two into the Twin Towers and one into the Pentagon.
Wikipedia:
Multiple investigations detailed how the hijackings and subsequent events caused the collapses.
Simon, you will recall me making a stink when the Court (or maybe it was US Atty in SDNY) would not let the “Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry” hand to the Grand Jury Foreman that U of Alaska study that refutes the NIST report. (Just search Gumshoe for “Meiswinkle”). My approach was to concentrate on the legal correctness of the citizenry contacting the Foreman with anything at all. Hence the illegality of the government preventing that.
So that’s me. That’s what I believe. We (Murkins) can’t just sit back and say “Oh what a pity, we’ve lost the Constitution.” We have to deal with that crime or malfeasance or whatever you call it.
(Fight me, punch me. I want to fight.)
(“Au contraire, mon frère”, “the articles of confederation are the maxim you seek-turns out the US Constitution is just a billing machine” and “lets get it on and be embarrassed together Sister-wink”)
Aside:
Funny all these years later I was at last Christmas family dinner, traveling some 1500k’s to have to politely excuse myself. This years host lost it when I started on his engineering employed by gov contacts “graduate”(ain’t that the truth,graded). 911(Pavlov me) would naturally come up in conversation, or the massive structure failure
Anywho as these things deteriorate as democracy descends on Simon getting to the host unable to share a space with my reason against a now litern of conspiracy theory’s neatly fielded , in the same house, started to leave.
Hey google was invited, does not take long to make it eat its tail, either. Maybe I just wanna fight like a Pavlov pit-bull
OK, OK, we are making progress here.
Simon, maybe I’m just desperate, but I think that even if we (“we” in the 250 years so far) were majorly duped — because somebody else was running a big money scheme,
my beliefs about Seppo-type freedom are nevertheless true.
And could be perfectly supportive right now of a Restoration.
Say, do you remember ‘restoration bosoms’?
Later thought: Plunging necklines aside, I think it should not be called a Restoration. Oldies like me would like to recapture what we had, but it is more appropriate today for the young to think for themselves.
(But I’d try to persuade them of Rule of Law as minimum and as inevitable for a good life.)
Do plunging necklines reveal bosom buddies, I don’t know, can’t think now, I’m bloke’n out
vive la bosoms
Exhibit B. George Orwell on the Real Purpose of War
“The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour…………….”
Washington D.C. ( District of Columbia )
“Columbia” is a name for “Goddess of Creation, War, and Destruction” better known as the goddess of death and pain. She is derived from the imagery of Semiramis, wife of Nimrod, and Queen of Babylon.
The statue on top of the Capitol building called the Statue of Freedom is actually Persephone, meaning “She who Destroys the Light”. She is the queen of the underworld (AKA the Catholic MARY). She is crowned with pentacles (pentagrams–stars with five points). When someone stands on something, it is usually an indication of ownership. Therefore, she owns the facility she stands upon. Although the dome (kippah) on top of the Capitol building was not finished until 1868, the final installation of this statue on top of the dome (kippah) took place on December 2, 1863. The original Capitol building, without the dome (kippah), was completed in 1826.
Columbia and Persephone are seen as other statues around Washington D.C. area.
“………. When it came time to pick a name for the new capital that was being moved from Charleston to its present site, Senator John Lewis Gervais, whom the present day street is named after, in 1786 said, “in this town we should find refuge under the wings of COLUMBIA.” It is from this speech that people rallied to name it Columbia, beating out the name Washington in an 11-7 vote in the state senate.
It is clear from Gerais’ quote that Columbia, South Carolina was named for the goddess Columbia and not Christopher Columbus.
https://esotericcolumbia.blogspot.com/2018/10/columbia-sc-isnt-named-after-columbus.html
WASHINGTON D. C. ASTRONOMY
“The Congress of Isis and Osiris just so happens to happen above.. Congress.
Washington D.C. and many of it’s buildings and monuments are laid out according to the cardinal directions with the streets running due NS and EW. In the map of Washington D.C. below, due east is up and the star chart shows the constellation of Orion rising due east over Washington D.C., as it has done every day for the past two hundred years. Orion’s belt points towards Sirius, the brightest star in the sky, and while Orion is rising and low on the eastern horizon, Orion’s belt is vertical, pointing to Sirius below…………………..”
https://home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/after3.html
Cracking the Canberra Code
“…….Hidden Symbolism in the New Parliament House: What Does it Mean?
I have to say that what I found in my research is much more than mere geometry; it is clear that there are esoteric symbols etched into the landscape and the buildings. It appears that the Griffins’ dream was to recreate aspects of an ancient golden age or perhaps a desire for a return to one.
https://wakeup-world.com/2014/10/27/cracking-the-canberra-code/
Thank you for that information, Caltrop. I’ve asked you before, are you of the flesh-and-blood variety, or AI?
I didn’t know that we got our kippah in 1863. Actually did not know that we even have a kippah.
Mary, I’m a flesh and blood living octogenarian who has been storing information away for decades.
Yay! Thanks.
xx
Longterm Gumshoers, someone asked me to comment on “Jan 6” so I searched for Jan 2021: and got this:
https://gumshoenews.com/2021/01/
which has an article about Anneke Lucas so I opened it up and was amazed to see comments by the late Gareth Train.
Also a comment by our dear late James, giving a lovely salute to Dee.
Guess the question was from an American, but wow Gareth. I wiki’ed and found the usual pattern i.e no doubt about it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wieambilla_shootings
lead me too GS 12/12/2022
Dr Reiner Fuellmich – Grand Jury Trial on The COVID Planners
nihil novi sub sole
xx
xx
1838 Jesuit slave sale – Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1838_Jesuit_slave_sale
In 1838, 272 men, women, and children were sold by the Maryland Jesuits; a portion of the proceeds was used to pay the debts of Georgetown College (now Georgetown University), also run by the Jesuits.The slaves had lived on plantations belonging to the Jesuits in Maryland, and they were sold to Henry Johnson and Jesse Batey.The sale price was $115,000, equivalent to $2,761,078 in 2019.
“…………..But even before the founding of Washington, D.C. – and even before the founding of the United States – there were already some links between the ancient city of Rome and this remote bit of farmland destined to become our nation’s capital.
The area that L’Enfant called Jenkins Hill was actually known as “New Troy,” dating all the way back to the original Maryland land grant in 1663. In Roman mythology, the ancient city of Troy was a precursor to Rome.
And the area around New Troy included a 400-acre farm that its owner had actually named Rome. He even renamed the modest Goose Creek, which flowed from the Potomac to the base of what would become Capitol Hill, the mighty Tiber Creek, after Rome’s Tiber River.
And his name – Francis Pope.
.
So there you go – even before its founding, Washington had a Rome, the Tiber, and a Pope.
Ciao, my work is done for the day.
https://historicdc.com/2012/08/08/capitoline-hill/
And the United States looks much like ancient Rome.
Washington’s Capitol Hill –
“…….Capitoline Hill: The Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus was located on the Capitoline Hill in Rome.
When designing Washington, D.C., George Washington and others very carefully chose symbols to convey their ideas. It was with this mindset that they desired to have America’s lawmakers to meet on a hill they chose to call Capitol Hill in honour of Jupiter’s Capitoline Hill. As described by Pamela Scott:
“The iconography of the panels decorating the south (which was to contain the House of Representatives) is derived from the most powerful ancient god, Jupiter, and the strongest ancient hero, Hercules. In the central panel, a single standing figure (representing either collective American patriots or Washington) takes an oath before the seated Jupiter … king of the gods in Roman mythology, … Oaths in ancient Rome were taken at the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, located on the Capitoline hill. (emphasis added) [16]
http://newhousefoundation.org/subpage6.html
Paganism And Catholicism: Sun Worship Symbols – Religion …
https://www.nairaland.com/1083971/paganism-catholicism-sun-worship-symbols
In the center of the square is an obelisk, a phallic symbol dedicated to the worship of the sun. The Vatican is built on the hill where the temple of Janus the sun god stood. Alongside St. John’s Lateran, which is the church where the Pope is crowned and where he speaks infallibly, is the obelisk of Tutmoses III, which was dedicated to Reharakti, the sun god.
There all the usuals are at it again.
Whilst enjoying yourselves with useless wind bagging I just backed my opinion again with 40,000 thousand of silver to add to my old Crowns.
Then I listen to this.
‘THE FED IS DEAD 5:22:26 EXPLOSION AND SPACE FORCE DISCLOSURE’ at Bin
227
Sorry to be possibly regarded as uncivil, but I have tried with you lot and most waste your time irrelevant old theories and fail to see what is really happening under all those irrelevant noses.
237
“If you don’t know where you have come from you don’t know where you are going.”
Does that infer that you know where you came from and how many times .
If you do not know that you have no bloody idea where to are going.
I common mistake grown out of arrogance and bigotry.
5- 33
The past has continued into the present.
Right!🤷♂️💁🙈
That sounds linear…..and you are going where?
907
The more things change the more they remain the same.
Oops,
Typo for the headline, insert -SILVER- before
EXPLOSION..
327
With your assistance we will make The Land mass known as the Commonwealth of Australia the Lucky Country that it should be!!!
The entity Country known as The Commonwealth of Australia is registered with the U.S. Securities and exchange commission as a corporation COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (0000805157)
All Law is biblical, and that it represents a Covenant between Man and God which is characterized as divine revelation. when we consider that government is founded exclusively on law, government itself then becomes a religion to implement or execute or enforce divine revelation. when government abuses the authority delegated by God through God’s Law, then it also becomes a false religious cult. this makes all western government nothing more than a cult surrounding the false religion it created with its own unjust law because this law has become a vain substitute and an affront to God’s Law found in the bible.
Do not lie, cheat and steal, the “Government”, the banks, the judiciary and the “Australian Tax Office” hate the competition.
http://www.reclaimaustralia.net/
Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises, Form #05.030
by Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM)
Publication date 2012-07-10 Topics Slavery, franchises, privileges, public rights, corruption, government corruption
https://archive.org/details/Franchises120710
https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/Franchises120710/Franchises-210203.pdf
The pVoting franchise –
Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. Dig. 50, 17, 69. But if he does not dissent he will be considered as assenting. Vide Assent.
Potest quis renunciare pro se, et suis, juri quod pro se introductum est. A man may relinquish, for himself and his heirs, a right which was introduced for his own benefit. See 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 83.
https://famguardian.org/Publications/BouvierMaximsOfLaw/BouviersMaxims.htmast has continued into the present.
I got a mention in Mary’s article, but the reality is ‘I’m out’! I had enough of the fraudsters in both the Parliament and judiciary (not to mention the medical profession) that I want nothing to do with ‘the system’. – If a man will lie to you once, he’ll lie to you twice.
For you, Terry …
• ”That’s it– I’m done”- – Dennis Wise on FTJ
https://ftjmedia.com/video/.0J2IpDFu1ZpnIvy7mQze2Q/that-s-it—i-m-done
Quote: “The primary aim of modern warfare … “
Referring to Matthew Raphael Johnson’s latest superb book
• Borhy Splacheni Krovyu: The Foundations and Causes of the Russo-Ukrainian War of 2022-2025 by Matthew Raphael Johnson
https://www.amazon.com.au/Borhy-Splacheni-Krovyu-Foundations-Russo-Ukrainian/dp/B0G4VYW127
At one point Dr Johnson states that Russian intelligence has learnt that up to TWO MILLLION Ukrainians have been killed [Col. Douglas MacGregor’s estimate is a mere 1.8 Million] That is THREE generations of Slavic Ukrainian men and boys sent into the fratricidic meat grinder by the jewish dictator Zelensky – in line with Marx’s ‘prophecy’ and Schneerson’s more recent dictate – to depopulate the Ukraine of Slavs and make way for “Big Israel” or “New Khazaria”.
For example: Page 272:
“Two million Ukrainian men have been killed, and as far as NATO and the Ukrainian government [Kiev] are concerned, this is a tolerable sacrifice so that maybe. a few more Russians – civilians and combatants – maybe killed as well.“
[I don’t need to quote or link the statements by Lindsey Graham.]
Page 273:
“A violent government plutocracy, normalized corruption, forcible conscription and the lack of any real long-range plan have made the clique of Jews in Kiev the most unpopular government on earth.”
Page 258:
[attributed to] Viktor Medvedchuk: “The President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, declared on numerous occasions that for the Russians, the Ukrainians were not enemies. That is why Zelensky’s power will be defeated and not the Ukrainian people. Today, Ukrainian soldiers die not for Ukraine that the regime sold to the West, but because of the corruption that enriches Zelensky and his entourage.”
[… ]
“Property purchases in Dubai are far from the only luxury properties Zelensky and his friends have bought.
Late in 2024, Ukrainian journalist Diana Panchenko reported on her social media accounts that, as Ukrainians suffer from the most severe economic crisis of their lives, 13 Rolls-Royce Phantoms, each worth about $550,000 (meaning they took all the options), eere purchased by members of parliament and other government officials in 2024 alone.”
Mary, I wish I could subscribe to your substack but I am locked out by the Australian ZOG/Judeo-Bolshevik regime’s requirement for me to accept the bio-digital mark of the beast
Mary, [or is that mAIry] at least you weren’t thrown out of the democratic, free-speech US constitutional forum …
• 🚨 BREAKING- Last night I was THROWN OUT of Frisco City Hall in TEXAS by the POLICE for speaking my mind!!! SPINE… – posted by Dennis Wise on FTJ
https://ftjmedia.com/video/.LTN8xbzzfwuQZw_v-8wNQg/%F0%9F%9A%A8-breaking–last-night-i-was-thrown-out-of-frisco-city-hall-in-texas-by-the-police-for-speaking-my-mind-spineless-city-council-was-voting-on-building-two-more-hindu-temples-anot…
Well, he wasn’t reading from a teleprompter, I’ll give him that much!
(First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….”)
Did those Founding Fathers also anticipate that this wording pertained to “Voodoo” …?
AI Overview: “Voodoo (spelled Vodou or Vodun) is an authentic, recognized religion. It originated in West Africa and evolved in the Americas through the blending of traditional African beliefs and Roman Catholicism. It is a complex spiritual system focused on connecting with nature, ancestors, and a supreme creator”
Well – that’s a new definition!! AI really is ‘clever’.
Of interest …
• Interview with Nick Heys – Tereza Coraggio
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=651440&post_id=198361910
https://rumble.com/v7a26kq-interview-with-nick-heys.html
(also on yewtube)
You (generally speaking, as in ‘yous’) should really purchase Tereza ‘s book
• How to Dismantle an Empire:
https://www.amazon.com/How-Dismantle-Empire-2020-Vision/dp/1733347607
(for each $42, the author receives a whopping $7)
Tereza has also generously published a full set of transcripts on her substack channel:
Third Paradigm on Substack: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/
“Let justice be done though the heavens fall“ …
• Syria Chemical Weapons False Flags Exposed – Kevin Barrett (and others reporting the same)
• With Piers Robinson
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/syria-chemical-weapons-false-flags-exposed/
FFWN on Rumble:
https://rumble.com/v7a4nso-syria-chemical-weapons-false-flags-exposed.html
FFWN on Bitchuite:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oas6fWKR1ans?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=kbarrett
Same topic …
• ‘Highly Protected’: OPCW confirms it buried critical evidence in Syria chemical weapons probe – Uprooted Palestinians
https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2026/05/10/highly-protected-opcw-confirms-it-buried-critical-evidence-in-syria-chemical-weapons-probe/
Exhibit C, above, is authored by medieval scholar Laurent Guyenot, whose 2024 book “The Pope’s Curse,” says:
“Starting with the 11th century monastic coup known as the Gregorian Reform, the Roman Church has injected the poison of individualism into Western civilisation by a self-entered doctrine of salvation…”
A 2014 book by Guyenot, “JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State” is still very on-point.
So ‘AI’ is wrong about the 19 Arabs/Muslims/[and now it’s] “militants” hijacking four commercial airplanes …?
“militants” – 😊 see how arse-covering, plausibility-denying clever they are?
Also from Laurent Guyénot recently:
• DEEP TRUMP: The conman who saved America from the Thucydides Trap – Laurent Guyénot
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=2972254&post_id=198157659
Excerpt: “Tucker Carlson recently confessed: “I’ll be tormented for a long time by the fact that I played a role in getting Donald Trump elected. And I want to say that I’m sorry for misleading people.” How can one not feel sorry and ashamed today for having believed in Trump? I’ll be honest: although I hold no responsibility in Trump’s election, I feel ashamed for having placed any hope in him.
Interesting – as I am still holding Tucker Carlson accountable for his shameful performance at the RNC convention [deliberate tautology]. Not yet convinced that he has ’reformed’ or is genuinely remorseful..
And speaking of the Pope …
• Christianity as a Jewish evolutionary strategy – Laurent Guyénot
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=2972254&post_id=193913303
Excerpt: “In recent posts, I have made a series of arguments that the Christianization of the Roman Empire has been good for the Jews (here and here) and bad for the Gentiles (here and here), and that it has paved the way for the subversion and subjugation of Western civilization by Jewish Power. …”
It apparent to me that Romes papal authority over the world, symbolised by the Popes 3 tiered crown has moved its statutory authority from Vatican Hill to Capitoline Hill, Washington, D.C.
“In 1968 after touring the United States, the crown was presented by Archbishop Luigi Raimondi, apostolic delegate to the United States, to Msgr. William McDonough, the shrine’s director.”
https://www.nationalshrine.org/blog/a-moment-in-history-the-papal-tiara-at-the-basilica/
Washington DC was established as a city-state in 1871 with the passage of the Act of 1871, which officially established the United States as a corporation under the rule of Washington, which itself is subservient to the Crown City of London.
Washington D.C. (District of Columbia)
https://treasury.gov.au/foi/documents-relating-to-registration-with-the-sec
The Vatican and Judaism originated from the same source – Babylonian Baal alias Nimrod worship which is anti-Shem.
—————-
The Illuminati Order was preceded in the 1500’s in Spain by the ‘Alumbrados’, a Christian heresy started by crypto-Jews called ‘Marranos’. The founder of the Jesuit Order, Ignatius of Loyola, was a Marrano / Alumbrado. Thus when people today argue whether it is the Jesuits or Zionists or Illuminati who are responsible for our troubles, they are really talking about the same beast.
Henry Makow
Solving the Mystery of BABYLON THE GREAT is the only book in print that examines the historical evidence in light of scripture and proves that the Roman Catholic Church was established by crypto-Jews as a false “Christian” front for a Judaic/Babylonian religion. Solving the Mystery of BABYLON THE GREAT explains the adoption by Jewish rabbis of the heathen occult practices of Babylon. Jesus criticized the Jews for practicing that Judaic/Babylonian amalgam religion. The Jews in turn sought revenge against Jesus and had him crucified.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
8 Crypto-Jewish Popes
https://archive.org/stream/solving-mysteryof-babylonthe-great-chapters-hdrhl/SolvingMysteryofBabylontheGreatChaptersHDRHL_djvu.txt
Location: 41° 54′ N , 12° 30′ E
Original Name: Mons Vaticanus (City of the Dead)
Year Founded: As Cemetary pre 600 BCE, as Temple to Cybele 204 BCE
Founders: Roman Senate
Location Function: Primary Temple (Phrygianum) to Magna Mater (Cybele)
Etymology: City of the Dead
Name Change: None
The Crown
Monday, February 9th, 2015
https://presscore.ca/news/the-crown/
Contrary to what you’ve been intentionally & fraudulently lead to believe, the Crown does not represent the government of Canada, nor the illegitimate German (Saxe-Cobourg & Gotha) Catholic (married Roman Catholic Hitler Youth schooled Philip Battenberg) Queen of England, Canada and the Commonwealth.. The Crown represents the “corporate entity” of the Pope (now Capitol Hill in the U.S.); self-proclaimed king of kings. For all intents and purposes, the Crown represents the Vatican Mafia and its “criminal” activities in Canada, the UK and the illegally established 1871 Crown Corporation UNITED STATES (10 square miles District of Columbia)
The Crown ceased to represent the UK and Canadian monarchy when Queen Victoria forfeited the Protestant England throne by marrying her “German” first cousin, “Roman Catholic” First Reich Prince Albert Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
Immediately upon Queen Victoria illegally marrying a Roman Catholic, violating the Act of Settlement of 1701 law and her coronation oath, Pope Pius IX assumed control of the German monarchy of England, Canada and the Commonwealth and the Bank of England. On Jan 1, 1855 the Bank of England became a Crown (Pope) Corporation called the “City of London Corporation”.
All Crown Corporations are illegally assumed (via racketeering) “corporate” assets of the Pope, who assumed the title “the Crown” (king of kings) during the First Vatican Council.
The City of London Corporation (the Bank of England; converted to a Crown Corporation on Jan. 1, 1855), the Bank of Canada (converted to a Crown Corporation in 1938), the Federal Reserve (1913 est. Crown Corporation) and the 10 square miles UNITED STATES (became a Crown Corporation in 1871 with the Act of 1871) are all Crown Corporations, illegally acquired by and controlled by the reigning Pope. ……………”
Statute law is the Law of the Sea or the Pirates of Finance Law which means guilty until proven innocent and over which the Queen or king have no jurisdiction – they have to get permission to enter the one mile square Crown City of London.
Queen Elizabeth11 at her coronation accepted a wedding ring attaching her to the Vatican – the Holy See (Sea).
On 2 June 1953, the queen on her coronation took an oath.
She was asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury, ‘Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel?’
She answered, ‘All this I promise to do.’
I heard Barnaby Joyce swear allegiance to the Queen in accordance with the Constitution.
Whosoever swears allegiance to her majesty the Queen is in turn a subject of the pope it seems.
From the 13th Century, a third symbol being a rod, often adorned with the symbol of the dove symbolising fealty to the Roman Cult and absolutely authority was added during the coronation ceremony of Edward I of England.
Queen Elizabeth 2 sat in Edward 1sts chair at her coronation
X. The Investiture per annulum, et per sceptrum et baculum
Then the Keeper of the Jewel House shall deliver to the Archbishop the Queen’s Ring, wherein is set a sapphire and upon it a ruby cross: the Archbishop shall put it on the fourth finger of her Majesty’s right hand, and say:
Receive the Ring of kingly dignity,
and the seal of Catholic Faith:
and as you are this day
consecrated to be our Head and Prince,
so may you continue steadfastly
as the Defender of Christ’s Religion;
that being rich in faith
and blessed in all good works,
you may reign with him who is the King of Kings,
to whom be the glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Then shall the Dean of Westminster bring the Sceptre with the Cross and the Rod with the Dove to the Archbishop.
.
http://www.oremus.org/liturgy/coronation/cor1953b.html
So the Papal title of VICAR OF CHRIST which in Latin is VICARIUS CHRISTI, means a SUBSTITUTE FOR CHRIST, which is synonymous with Antichrist, i.e., assuming the power of God on earth! This blasphemous claim is made repeatedly by various Popes and is the very foundation of Roman Catholicism and it’s Papacy.
.
http://biblelight.net/666.htm
I happened to turn on a radio last night to catch up on the footy scores – the ABC ‘News’ headlines came on to rape my mind and announce the outbreak of the “VIRUS” Diphtheria (I was expecting a Hanta-variant but that will have to do) and the urgent need to roll out vaccination – especially in the Aboriginal communities … the following seemed topical … (Hint: Diphtheria is NOT a ‘virus’)
• Diphtheria Disinformation: What You Need To Know – Dr Sam Bailey
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Diphtheria:e
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/germ-theory/diphtheria-disinformation-what-you-need-to-know/
Related:
• Tick Plague Making People Allergic to Meat? | Daily Pulse Ep 255 – ZeeeMedia
https://rumble.com/v7a3a6w-tick-plague-making-people-allergic-to-meat-daily-pulse-ep-255.html
The Real Truth Behind The Signing Of The Magna Carta
http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-real-truth-behind-the-signing-of-the-magna-carta
In 1215 the nobles revolted and forced King John to sign the Magna Carta on 15 June 1215. This document consists of 61 clauses relating to the establishment of various constitutional and legal rights, but its principal purpose was to cancel the bonds of the Jewish moneylenders and to abolish usury and the privileged position of the Jews.
On 24th August 1215 the Pope declared the Magna Carta null and void.
“…………Magna Carta – An Immediate Success…?
No. Not in the slightest.
Yes, King John agreed to the terms of Magna Carta, and yes, the barons renewed their oaths of allegiance to him. But the settlement did not last long. The security clause and the 25 barons of Magna Carta made it difficult for King John to wriggle out of the agreement as freely as he would have liked (for he had now given the royal seal of approval to a document that made him as susceptible to the law as any other ‘free man’), and he was much aggrieved by the manner in which Magna Carta had been enforced. And so he sought help from the Pope
Pope Innocent III
At the time, the pope was the official overlord of the kingdoms of England and Ireland. King John sent messengers to the Pope requesting that Magna Carta be annulled. In response, the barons did not give up the city of London and vowed not to do so until the terms of the charter were implemented.
Pope Innocent III saw the Magna Carta from the king’s perspective, however, and was indeed very alarmed by the charter’s terms. On 24th August 1215 the pope issued the papal bull, a document in which he describes Magna Carta as “illegal, unjust, harmful to royal rights and shameful to the English people”. The papal bull declared Magna Carta “null and void of all validity forever” …………”
http://www.magnacartatranslation.com/about-us/magna-carta/
By the terms of the “FOREVER” Treaty of 1213, the Vatican has since owned the Crown which it has rented to the British Monarchy per the terms of said Treaty, to wit:
http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/123/211-the-secret-behind-secret-societies/
As the Vatican Crown is now held in the United States it can be assumed that the British Crown is now rented out by Rothschilds Crown City of London.
The Treaty of Verona and the Deception That is the Magna Carta.
https://revolutionharry.blogspot.com/2010/03/treaty-of-verona-and-deception-that-is.html
27 comments:
Captain Ranty said…
I love this subject. It is absolutely fascinating.
Notice that we are described as “things”? In some versions of Blacks Law Dictionary we are also known as monsters, imbeciles or simply children.
If we are (collectively) chattel, it is no wonder they treat us with such contempt, disdain and disgust.
I am glad that I served my papers and that I am well out of it.
I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current and legal system in use in Australia and its States Territories has no basis in law. Sir Harry Gibbs Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia: 1970 – 1981
The Video Israel Wishes You Hadn’t Seen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxwsZb9d5IQ